• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** New Zealand in England

Richard

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Gillespie back now? Or do you back Elliott for a repeat job?

Gillespie will be harder to slog but will slip onto the bat easier.

And it will be Elliott.
 
Richard

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
You could not wish to see a much more complete bowling performance. Every bowler played his part.

Haha, Grant Elliott has clearly tried to edit his mostly SAffie accent into a Kiwi one. :laugh: Just like Pietersen over here.
 
wpdavid

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
Samuel_Vimes said:
Yeah, well, look, when your team is doing pathetically against a team with four rookies on their first overseas tour and the whole system seems to be replaced by a form you don't really care for in five years, plus the whole thing is the most corrupt sport on the face of the earth, you do despair.
Click to expand...
Yup. And the the thing about the proposed changes is that they do absolutely nothing to improve matters from the spinelessly inept garbage that we've seen from most of today's XI. The only logical conclusion is that they will make matters significantly worse. But hey, what's that in the face of a quick buck?
Well done NZ, but they should never have had a sniff of the game from 45 for 5, or even from their final total. One of the worst batting displays ever, and we've seen a few from this bunch of lazy tossers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top