• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** English Domestic Season 2008

Status
Not open for further replies.

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
As Mohammad Yousuf and the might of Steven Croft power on (depressing that we can get three batsmen of the calibre of Sutcliffe, Loye and du Plessis out for ducks and the next lowest score to be dismissed for is 152) it seems Goughy has decided to take it easy:
Code:
D Gough       12 5 25 1 2.08 (1w) 
TT Bresnan    27 8 61 1 2.25 (1nb) 
RM Pyrah      22 6 86 0 3.90  
BW Sanderson  23 2 81 1 3.52 (1w) 
AU Rashid     32 3 99 1 3.09  
A McGrath      5 0 19 0 3.80
Can't blame him too much I suppose, this game is a foregone conclusion.
 

Perm

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
He should still be trying his hardest though, regardless of the match situation.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Not really. No point damaging your chances for later in the season (Gough said a few days ago that he often struggles in the First-Class game these days) by trying hard when you don't need to in a game where the result is a foregone conclusion.

I'd much rather Gough save his efforts and be more likely to be able to put-in a telling performance later in the season in a crucial game.
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
Not really. No point damaging your chances for later in the season (Gough said a few days ago that he often struggles in the First-Class game these days) by trying hard when you don't need to in a game where the result is a foregone conclusion.

I'd much rather Gough save his efforts and be more likely to be able to put-in a telling performance later in the season in a crucial game.
Forgive me for repeating what I wrote elsewhere, but I was so impressed to see Yorkshire fielding 10 tykes in this game.
 

Goughy

Hall of Fame Member
Forgive me for repeating what I wrote elsewhere, but I was so impressed to see Yorkshire fielding 10 tykes in this game.
The depressing thing though is a reject XI (11 Tykes at other counties) would probably be stronger than this one.

Cant fault Yorkshire for producing talent. However that conveyer belt means they are too cheap to pay peak career players as they can just bring in another youngster.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Forgive me for repeating what I wrote elsewhere, but I was so impressed to see Yorkshire fielding 10 tykes in this game.
9, ITBT. Neither Rudolph or Brophy are anything less than 100% Protean.

Fat lot of good it's doing though TBH. Don't rate either of Sanderson or Pyrah as far as I can throw 'em really, Bresnan is bowling much better this season than he ever has before but still has plenty to do, Sayers has been OK of late but had a very poor start to his career and has gone poorly again this year, Lyth doesn't look up to much yet, Andrew Gale is going good recently which is good to see (not least because he's writing for us on CW.n), and Gough won't be playing again after this season.

Only Gale and Rashid who I'm confident of on a long-term basis though TBH.

BTW, any of the Middlesex lot on here know whether Robbie Williams is going to be playing again this season? :p
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
The depressing thing though is a reject XI (11 Tykes at other counties) would probably be stronger than this one.
OK, I'll make a start:
- Sidebottom
- Silverwood
- And now I'm struggling. No doubt I've forgotten someone really obvious
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
The depressing thing though is a reject XI (11 Tykes at other counties) would probably be stronger than this one.
OK, I'll make a start:
- Sidebottom
- Silverwood
- And now I'm struggling. No doubt I've forgotten someone really obvious
Certainly always been disappointed Silverwood left, personally I'd have liked Hutchison to have stayed as I always thought he could've been quite good, and Sidebottom, well, obviously. Gavin Hamilton isn't a Yorkshireman but likewise I've always been disappointed he tailed-off so badly and so quickly.

Matthew Wood's position had become pretty untenable but still I don't think there's anyone much better in the current squad either.

The likes of Byas and Blakey retired, obviously, but I've always thought they should've had more made of them late on.
 

steds

Hall of Fame Member
Sutcliffe & Keedy are frogs playing against Yorkshire as we speak. Lancs also have Chilton & Chapple
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
9, ITBT. Neither Rudolph or Brophy are anything less than 100% Protean.

Fat lot of good it's doing though TBH. Don't rate either of Sanderson or Pyrah as far as I can throw 'em really, Bresnan is bowling much better this season than he ever has before but still has plenty to do, Sayers has been OK of late but had a very poor start to his career and has gone poorly again this year, Lyth doesn't look up to much yet, Andrew Gale is going good recently which is good to see (not least because he's writing for us on CW.n), and Gough won't be playing again after this season.

Only Gale and Rashid who I'm confident of on a long-term basis though TBH.

BTW, any of the Middlesex lot on here know whether Robbie Williams is going to be playing again this season? :p
Ah, I must have forgotten to check Rudolph on cricinfo.
Only kidding. I suppose I assumed that Brophy sounded like a Yorkshire name.

Yeah, I know that most of them aren't up to much at this point, but it still makes a welcome change after seeing Surrey vs Somerset yesteday with neither side able to field a home-produced bowler.
 

Perm

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Not really. No point damaging your chances for later in the season (Gough said a few days ago that he often struggles in the First-Class game these days) by trying hard when you don't need to in a game where the result is a foregone conclusion.

I'd much rather Gough save his efforts and be more likely to be able to put-in a telling performance later in the season in a crucial game.
If his fitness prevents him from putting in 100% in every situation, then I'd have my doubts as to why he is still playing. Not exactly setting a good example for the younger guys either, aside from the fact Gough himself is essentially getting a full pay check despite not putting in his best efforts.

I can understand it from your point of view, but I feel that players should always try their hardest. Whether that's because I'm an idealist 17 year old, I don't know... :p
 

Goughy

Hall of Fame Member
OK, I'll make a start:
- Sidebottom
- Silverwood
- And now I'm struggling. No doubt I've forgotten someone really obvious
There are too many to mention around the Championship.

Off the top of my head a Yorkshire born, but not playing for Yorkshire seam bowling attack would look something like Sidebottom, Silverwood, Chapple, Kirby, Plunkett etc.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
There are too many to mention around the Championship.

Off the top of my head a Yorkshire born, but not playing for Yorkshire seam bowling attack would look something like Sidebottom, Silverwood, Chapple, Kirby, Plunkett etc.
Was Chapple ever on Yorkshire's books?

I've always thought of Chapple as about as Yorkshire as Michael Vaughan is Lancastrian really.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
If his fitness prevents him from putting in 100% in every situation, then I'd have my doubts as to why he is still playing. Not exactly setting a good example for the younger guys either, aside from the fact Gough himself is essentially getting a full pay check despite not putting in his best efforts.
It's possible to take that view, yes. However, I'd tend to think that if Gough can produce you 15 overs a day and take 3-36 (hypothetical - obviously it's not always going to be that good) he's more valuable than someone like Ben Sanderson who can give you 25 overs but will probably be more likely to take 1-100.

I think Gough has probably chosen a good time to retire, I'd not be too keen on him playing any more seasons after this.
 

Goughy

Hall of Fame Member
Do you really think of Middlesborough as Yorkshire? I know in theory it is, but it always feels far more Durham than Yorkshire to me.
Of course. It is part of Yorkshire and Yorkshire played there for generations.

Why would it be anything else?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top