It's all proper shots tooWatto going absolutely mental. Wish I could watch this.
Another "You're wrong, Ump" moment. A run-out attempt was successful at keeper's end, but umpire Steve Davis refused to refer. Until Sehwag forcefully had the referral done.
Talking of Sehwag, he said after the loss to Chennai that they lacked a fifth bowler, and Amit Mishra came in here. Then why did he have to get himself on? That only turned into a big-hitting opportunity for the Royals.
Mahesh is their top wicket-taker, and Sehwag was smashed in the last match by Morkel and now got smashed this time as well, by Watson and Dimi.Mahesh got smashed so Sehwag bowled his remaining quota I guess.
Sehwag took 2-0-21-1, Mahesh 2.1-0-35-0.Mahesh is their top wicket-taker, and Sehwag was smashed in the last match by Mørkel and now got smashed this time as well, by Watson and Dimi.
Mahesh had a few catches dropped off him, and some misfields as well. Moreover, that was Shane Watson batting, and you need your best bowler facing him, not someone smashed for 30 runs in two overs last time around. Besides, they had McGrath and Maharoof as well, so they could have tried both to claim those wickets.Sehwag took 2-0-21-1, Mahesh 2.1-0-35-0.
Obviously Mahesh is the better bowler but that doesn't automatically mean you bowl Mahesh ahead of Sehwag 100% of the time.
Called it (H)It was a pretty sick knock though, wanted him to get a hundred as no other Indian has done so this tournament.
Also Cricinfo on how RC's and Chargers have struggled due to lack of quality locals. Boom-boom the biggest flop of the tournament?
It's a good idea to try different combinations, especially when you're firmly at the top of the table. Rajasthan have done well to try all their players and have some tested bench strength.Sid Trivedi had another surprisingly good match now. He may just hold his place in the XI, but questions may be asked about fielding both Munaf and Sid together. Do you need that? Both are average bowlers, and while Sid isn't very powerful or consistent, Munaf has lost a lot of pace and is a liability on th field. Instead, that place can go to a batsman who's very effective on the field, and let the four overs be bowled by Yusuf Pathan with Ravi Jadeja as backup. Something to think about?
Can't say I've agreed with any of your posts in this thread. Both are going at about 7.7 an over, which is a very acceptable rate and both (especially Trivedi) have picked up key wickets. Warne is getting the most out of them and to change a winning, top of the table formula now seems really silly.Sid Trivedi had another surprisingly good match now. He may just hold his place in the XI, but questions may be asked about fielding both Munaf and Sid together. Do you need that? Both are average bowlers, and while Sid isn't very powerful or consistent, Munaf has lost a lot of pace and is a liability on th field. Instead, that place can go to a batsman who's very effective on the field, and let the four overs be bowled by Yusuf Pathan with Ravi Jadeja as backup. Something to think about?