Have a look at the comments, including you're own.So nothing! No one is saying anything about his batting FFS. He could be Bradman with the bat and that would be fine and great, but if he bowls crap we can't call him a crap bowler? If someone bowls, its perfectly fair to criticize their bowling. I don't understand what's so complicated about this.
Best young bat in Australia - super player IMOTwo beautiful shots by Watson. Wow.
No, sorry. White is crap. Or at the very least, he was total crap today.
Haha, Guardian commentary is hilarious.
"An Indian side picking Cameron White as a spinner? Bishan Bedi would be spinning in his grave - if he were dead."
The worst part is that this is India. You can find someone better than that in the 3rd XI for a Ranji side FFS.
These were my comments on White - I don't understand where I called him a bad batsman? I'd like to know, because if I did, I'd be happy to take that comment back.Really? Who in our Test side wouldn't 'hold a candle' to Cameron White as a Test batsman?
And the reason people aren't getting over the bowling part is because he bowled in this game. Everyone realizes he is there as a batsman too.
??? Yuvraj is a crap bowler too. I don't understand what you're trying to say. You can't criticize someone's bowling because they are a good batsman (not that Yuvi is one)?Do yourself a favour and look at him like Yuvi (without the test failures of course) - hard hitting batsman, great field, bowl a few overs when required
When he comes on to bowl, he's a bowler and I'm going to look at him as a bowler. When he bats, I'll look at him as a batsman. When Yuvi comes on to bowl, and bowls crap, guess what - he'll be a crap bowler too. You don't get a free pass when you concede 24 runs in an over.The guy is a batsman and is ridiculed for his bowling as if this has somehow become his speciality after a few years of being no more than a part-timer
Basically, the attention paid to his bowling is ridiculous - he's not a front-liner and almost certainly will never be??? Yuvraj is a crap bowler too. I don't understand what you're trying to say. You can't criticize someone's bowling because they are a good batsman (not that Yuvi is one)?
When he comes on to bowl, he's a bowler and I'm going to look at him as a bowler. When he bats, I'll look at him as a batsman. When Yuvi comes on to bowl, and bowls crap, guess what - he'll be a crap bowler too. You don't get a free pass when you concede 24 runs in an over.
That's just it though - they didn't pick him as a spinner. They picked him as a batsman and he had a bowl to change things up after everyone else got belted. You were acting as if they'd picked him as a bowler or expected him to bowl four overs; that's not true. It'd be like bitching and moaning about a team picking Yuvraj as a spinner if he bowled one over.silenstriker said:Haha, Guardian commentary is hilarious.
"An Indian side picking Cameron White as a spinner? Bishan Bedi would be spinning in his grave - if he were dead."
....
The worst part is that this is India. You can find someone better than that in the 3rd XI for a Ranji side FFS.
But so far, we've only seen in a little bit, and the fact is whether he is a good bowler or not, he did bowl, and he did concede 24 overs.Basically, the attention paid to his bowling is ridiculous - he's not a front-liner and almost certainly will never be
I don't ever remember denying or disagreeing with that.However, as a batsman, he may be something very special