I won't even ask how you're placed to make that comparison.This is just a big steaming pile of donkey jizz.
Stupid bloody game.
This is really starting to piss me off.
There are so many things wrong with that Strauss shot. Go back to Middlesex and learn how to bat again.
This "holiday" lark not treating you well?This is just a big steaming pile of donkey jizz.
Ind33d. Oh well, at least we took it to a decider.What's that old saying you can't win a test in the 1st session but you can lose it - well England are definately losing it now.
That makes absolutley no sense. If someone loses the test in a session, surely the opposing team wins it?What's that old saying you can't win a test in the 1st session but you can lose it - well England are definately losing it now.
Even this isn't quite as bad as The Wanderers 1999\2000, though at least people were saying England weren't even good enough to be touring (despite the presence of Atherton, Hussain, Stewart, Caddick, Gough and a Vaughan on his 1st tour) in that game, so it wasn't quite as bad as this.Seeing as the way that England are rewarding my first day off for five weeks is to produce the worst first half-hour of a Test match I have ever had the misfortune to witness, no. Considering either (a) bed or (b) reading about the dark ages as a far more enjoyable alternative right now.
I think having major dental surgery would be more enjoyable TBH?Seeing as the way that England are rewarding my first day off for five weeks is to produce the worst first half-hour of a Test match I have ever had the misfortune to witness, no. Considering either (a) bed or (b) reading about the dark ages as a far more enjoyable alternative right now.
Need at least 300 for that wicket alone to make a game of this though.May be 7-3, but NZ have to continue to make this new ball count. I wouldn't put it past Pietersen and Bell putting on a 150-200 on this pitch if they get through this new ball.
The key word being witness.Even this isn't quite as bad as The Wanderers 1999\2000, though at least people were saying England weren't even good enough to be touring (despite the presence of Atherton, Hussain, Stewart, Caddick, Gough and a Vaughan on his 1st tour) in that game, so it wasn't quite as bad as this.
Nope, the other team can then lose it again.That makes absolutley no sense. If someone loses the test in a session, surely the opposing team wins it?
just try to distract yourself. You will always get the nagging thought "ahh whats happening in the cricket now" and will have to switch it on again. I try often but just can't get away. Bed doesn't work either. You wake up randomly thinking "ahh whats happening in the cricket now."Seeing as the way that England are rewarding my first day off for five weeks is to produce the worst first half-hour of a Test match I have ever had the misfortune to witness, no. Considering either (a) bed or (b) reading about the dark ages as a far more enjoyable alternative right now.
You didn't see Jo'burg 99\00? Can only presume the 14-year-old Dickinson knew better how to spend his time than the 14-year-old Pickup then TBH.The key word being witness.
SKYYou didn't see Jo'burg 99\00? Can only presume the 14-year-old Dickinson knew better how to spend his time than the 14-year-old Pickup then TBH.
Even this isn't quite as bad as The Wanderers 1999\2000, though at least people were saying England weren't even good enough to be touring (despite the presence of Atherton, Hussain, Stewart, Caddick, Gough and a Vaughan on his 1st tour) in that game, so it wasn't quite as bad as this.
Your mum\dad never heard of ONdigital then?