dontcloseyoureyes
BARNES OUT
This comes as no surprise to me.Pup - rottweiler or poodle?
Averages 64 when we're coasting, 22 when we're roasting.
Pup - bark worse than bite?
This comes as no surprise to me.Pup - rottweiler or poodle?
Averages 64 when we're coasting, 22 when we're roasting.
Pup - bark worse than bite?
Doesn't Ian Bell have similar stats to this too? I remember either Cricinfo or someone on here criticising him.Pup - rottweiler or poodle?
Averages 64 when we're coasting, 22 when we're roasting.
Pup - bark worse than bite?
Pretty funny question, given that Symonds and Hussey have never been in a losing Australian team before. Symonds had a 100% winning record until yesterday in fact. Hussey had at least been part of one draw.Obviously cracks when the teams under pressure. Do you have Symonds' and Hussey's stats for winning and losing matches for Australia? These two are the ones that usually step up in times of need.
That's because his good technique in defence doesn't transfer over when playing shots on tracks with more bounce than the average Indian track. This problem's been there for quite some time as well.Jaffer's been out the same way all series but in between the outs, he's looked a solid player. If he gets that kink out of his game, he'll be good.
Minus the slips-catching.Clarke. The new Mark Waugh.
Clarke has better taste in women.Clarke. The new Mark Waugh.
Beautiful to watch but never quite reaches his full potential in Test cricket?Clarke. The new Mark Waugh.
Yeah. I reckon that a lot of it is adjustment problem. This is his first time in Australia and it isn't some thing every one can get used to fast. He did look better in Canberra and has given us runs in the recent past in England, other places. Given that the team management has shown confidence in him, I would back him and pick him for Adelaide. The other option is 5 bowlers and that would mean one of two things, neither of which I am comfortable with:Top_Cat said:Jaffer's been out the same way all series but in between the outs, he's looked a solid player. If he gets that kink out of his game, he'll be good.
I sure hope not.Did I expect any different from the President and CEO of the Nathan Bracken Fan Club?
Don't sit on the fence. Let us know what you really think.****ing hell, this is the biggest bull**** ever. **** you Dhoni and **** you BCCI.
Look upon it as an investment opportunity.Who cares? This ODI series will be the longest snoozefest in the history of cricket. I want another Test added to the series tbh.
Clarke's already reached his potential imo.Beautiful to watch but never quite reaches his full potential in Test cricket?
Hope not TBH...
Yeah agreed he's just had a shakey series, that's all. I love watching Pup in ODI's.Clarke's already reached his potential imo.
Could've been worse, Dhoni could've been captain of the test team and we'd have saved a couple of 2's and 3's , but Dravid and Ganguly might have been out of the test team too.(and consequently lost Bangalore and Perth).****ing hell, this is the biggest bull**** ever. **** you Dhoni and **** you BCCI.
That's rather insulting to Dhoni. There is some sense in dropping Dravid and Ganguly for the one-day squad; doing the same in the test squad (along with dropping a few others as well) would be stupid and foolhardy no matter how you look at it. Dhoni would not have done asked for such changes in the test team - cut the crap.Could've been worse, Dhoni could've been captain of the test team and we'd have saved a couple of 2's and 3's , but Dravid and Ganguly might have been out of the test team too.(and consequently lost Bangalore and Perth).
Dravid, perhaps, due to his form. (but his form in the first 2 tests was scratchy too).That's rather insulting to Dhoni. There is some sense in dropping Dravid and Ganguly for the one-day squad; doing the same in the test squad (along with dropping a few others as well) would be stupid and foolhardy no matter how you look at it. Dhoni would not have done asked for such changes in the test team - cut the crap.