I don't have as much against Amla as I once did. As I said earlier in this thread, he's improved his technique remarkably in recent times. It's still not great or anything, but it's better than a few others going around. He's still a bit wristy and loose outside off at times but he's improved his trigger movements, backlift, backward defense and off-stump judgement to a degree where he's passable to me.Must be so bittersweet for Prince EWS, this. In heaven watching one end then would want to throw his TV out the window on the other
Anyways to state the obvious, NZ can get as many early wickets as they want, it doesn't mean much unless they can get Kallis here. Good start from NZ though, wish Bond was playing
Iain O'Brien has actually been surprisingly unterribleMust be so bittersweet for Prince EWS, this. In heaven watching one end then would want to throw his TV out the window on the other
Anyways to state the obvious, NZ can get as many early wickets as they want, it doesn't mean much unless they can get Kallis here. Good start from NZ though, wish Bond was playing
Granted I'm fairly ignorant on SA cricket, and I know AB de Villers would and has opened, but who else is there, Boeta Dippenaar?Does Graeme Smith deserve his place in this SA lineup on batting alone?
Yeah. He sucks against Chris Martin and always has but he had a decent enough tour of Pakistan IIRC and still averages over 46 with the bat at test level. Granted he hasn't been at the top of his game in the last year or two but he's in safer waters, even on batting alone, than Gibbs, as he's still a better opener than Dippenaar.Does Graeme Smith deserve his place in this SA lineup on batting alone?
He had a really poor 2006 but hasn't been too bad this year, averaging almost 40. Not enough to drop a batsman, IMODoes Graeme Smith deserve his place in this SA lineup on batting alone?
Loots Bosman for mine.Granted I'm fairly ignorant on SA cricket, and I know AB de Villers would and has opened, but who else is there, Boeta Dippenaar?
Yeah, it doesn't do much apart from highlight just how excruciatingly piss-poor guys like O'Brien and Gillespie are at test levelShould NZ just say to Smith, "look, just say you've scored 550/3. We will be behind by 370. Can we start our innings now?"
FFS, it's obviously that Kallis will score 250 plus. Why bother bowling all these overs? It will only injure some more of our bowlers.
Yeah, because he converts his centuries into scores of 250 plus regularly...FFS, it's obviously that Kallis will score 250 plus..
Hyperbole? Kallis getting past 200....FFS, it's obviously that Kallis will score 250 plus. Why bother bowling all these overs? It will only injure some more of our bowlers.
Test match cricket...Loots Bosman for mine.
Yeah, pretty amazing that he has scored 28 tons but no doublesYeah, because he converts his centuries into scores of 250 plus regularly...