• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** New Zealand in South Africa

Flem274*

123/5
In FC cricket that was my suggestion, but I think he's a better bowler than Franklin and offers more variety. Slower though, and not quite as effective with late hitting. McCullum is similar to Vettori, but a much better fielder and more destructive batsman. Doesn't take a lot of wickets but usually doesn't give up too many runs.

Mason has already played a Test.

How can you like Hopkins as an ODI batsman? Been dire in the past and isn't much better now. Gunning it in the longer format though.

Ryder averages 48.71 for New Zealand A, with two centuries and one fifty from 7 innings.
Hopkins dire OD batsman? Always thought he was a gun, or am I mixing up formats again...

Ryder's average annoys me. Proving he's a gun but too much of a **** to get selected.

With regards to McCullum, if we played the three spinners what effect do you think we would have? Could be similar to the dibbly dobbly 92 WC days.
 

Athlai

Not Terrible
The argument I think would be that currently at number 3 Taylor has 9 under 15 scores from 12 innings including 4 ducks.

Fulton meanwhile has 1 under 15 from 6 innings.
 
Last edited:

Flem274*

123/5
Why? Fulton at #4 and Styris at #5. That's our strongest middle order, and I'd like to see you try and argue that.
:wallbash:

Forgot Fleming isn't coming back. Got myself all over excited with the thoughts of him returning after ditching Braces.:cry:

Seriously tempted to argue TBH

Fulton
Fleming
Styris

Would be my dream middle order. But it won't happen. I'm not gonna bother to argue.
 

Perm

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Hopkins dire OD batsman? Always thought he was a gun, or am I mixing up formats again...

Ryder's average annoys me. Proving he's a gun but too much of a **** to get selected.

With regards to McCullum, if we played the three spinners what effect do you think we would have? Could be similar to the dibbly dobbly 92 WC days.
Yup, certainly are.

Look how good we were in 92. One of our best ODI teams.
 

Perm

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
The argument I think would be that currently at number 3 Taylor has 9 under 15 scores from 12 innings including 4 ducks.

Fulton meanwhile has 1 under 15 from 6 innings.
Not saying we should put Fulton there though, as he averages 50 at 4.
Ya-huh. Fulton scores centuries at #4, Taylor scores them at #3. Natural positions for both, I wouldn't mess with them ITBT.
 

Athlai

Not Terrible
:wallbash:

Forgot Fleming isn't coming back. Got myself all over excited with the thoughts of him returning after ditching Braces.:cry:

Seriously tempted to argue TBH

Fulton
Fleming
Styris

Would be my dream middle order. But it won't happen. I'm not gonna bother to argue.
Styris has only played once at 3, hit 48 against Zimbabwe years ago.
 

Athlai

Not Terrible
Ya-huh. Fulton scores centuries at #4, Taylor scores them at #3. Natural positions for both, I wouldn't mess with them ITBT.
Still worried about Taylors hot/cold form TBH, but I spose the reliability of Fulton and Styris can cover him for till he settles down a bit more on the international stage.
 

Perm

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Still worried about Taylors hot/cold form TBH, but I spose the reliability of Fulton and Styris can cover him for till he settles down a bit more on the international stage.
Indeed. You have to place a bit of faith in Taylor, IMO, as he has shown what he can do and will continue to grow his game.
 

Flem274*

123/5
Indeed. You have to place a bit of faith in Taylor, IMO, as he has shown what he can do and will continue to grow his game.
I certainly hope so. As much as his inconsistency annoys me it would be great if he become a consistent opposition destroyer.

I don't rate his chances of ever being much of a decent test batsman until he tidies up his technique and improves his temperament though.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Yup, certainly are.

Look how good we were in 92. One of our best ODI teams.
It's a different game these days. Different pitches, different requirements, different tactics. Bangladesh have often gone into games with three very respectable spinners and they've simply not been effective due to the roles they have to play with the lack of pace options, particularly in the PowerPlays which make it really hard for spinners.

Is there anything soooo wrong about Mason as an ODI player? Obviously he isn't great or anything, but he's very effective on pitches that suit him and he can be quite useful on pitches that don't providing they aren't completely flat. He doesn't have much pace but despite my comments a few years ago that he was the one of the worst bowlers I'd seen at international level, he's not that bad. He's improved his accuracy quite a bit over the last few years IMO and he does move the new ball a bit. He length is generally very, very good which is handy with the bounce he gets, even if his line strays a bit at time. His last 10 ODIs have consisted of:

10-1-50-2 v Sri Lanka
9-1-24-4 v Sri Lanka
10-1-62-0 v Sri Lanka
TDNB
10-2-46-2 v Australia
9-0-29-2 v Kenya
8-0-60-1 v Canada
6-2-14-0 v West Indies
2-1-4-0 v Bangladesh
3-0-27-0 v Australia

Again, he's obviously not a great bowler, but he's not the worst bowler ever either, and he can be quite effective at times when he gets it right. For a bowler who spends most of each tour getting cold on the sidelines, he doesn't do that badly IMO. Certainly one level about the likes of Gillespie and Franklin who regularly get picked ahead of him IMO. At least Franklin can bat I suppose.
 

Top