Prince EWS
Global Moderator
Indeed. He's obviously not a very good batsman, but the criteria allowed me to overlook that and pick on personal preference.D Ganga
1968 @ 27.33
Whatever floats your boat mate.
Indeed. He's obviously not a very good batsman, but the criteria allowed me to overlook that and pick on personal preference.D Ganga
1968 @ 27.33
Whatever floats your boat mate.
Flowers record is impressive and he had played more than 20 tests so I felt it pretty fair to include him in this. I'm also quite sure someone will come along (Richard) and give you their opinion on way one batsman's runs are worth more than another's (sorry about the reference Rich).Went straight by averages and excluded Flower due to the short length of time that he played in the period in question. Unless someone can give me specific reasoning for why one batsman's runs are worth more than another's I see no reason that the most prolific run scorers should not be picked.
Unless you consider I also stated 40+ average. Ah well.Indeed. He's obviously not a very good batsman, but the criteria allowed me to overlook that and pick on personal preference.
I took that as meaning that one had to average 40+ to make your list; not having to average such to be eligible for my vote. I'll have Younis Khan if I can't have Ganga.Unless you consider I also stated 40+ average. Ah well.
I'll try to explain mine:Went straight by averages and excluded Flower due to the short length of time that he played in the period in question. Unless someone can give me specific reasoning for why one batsman's runs are worth more than another's I see no reason that the most prolific run scorers should not be picked.
I feel openers probably do have a harder job than middle order bats in most cases, so for me I find it difficult to rate them alongside middle order batsmen.What Hayden has done as an opener no others have done, and the way he has dismantled attacks cracks him in that group.
Yeah, he'll probably come up with some theory on how Yousuf's presence at the crease disrupts the earth's magnetic field, and thus everyone's hands become repellent to the ball when hes at the crease, leading to him being dropped 7,846,952 times more than any other batsman in the history of cricket. I know.Flowers record is impressive and he had played more than 20 tests so I felt it pretty fair to include him in this. I'm also quite sure someone will come along (Richard) and give you their opinion on way one batsman's runs are worth more than another's (sorry about the reference Rich).
Waiting for the day he accuses someone of black magic TBH.Yeah, he'll probably come up with some theory on how Yousuf's presence at the crease disrupts the earth's magnetic field, and thus everyone's hands become repellent to the ball when hes at the crease, leading to him being dropped 7,846,952 times more than any other batsman in the history of cricket. I know.
Its a public poll, FFS!Who was the drunkard that voted for Vaughan?
He's being sinister and I can't believe you didn't vote for Flem TBH.Flower, Kallis and Sangakara. Probaly not the best batsmen, but all have a reasonable claim and I like to watch them. And voting for Ponting is boring.
And yes Athlai, I did restrain myself from voting Fleming on purpose.
EDIT: and how is Dontcloseyoreyes voting for more than three people? I'll just assume my computer is screwing up as per usual.
Pretty much what I was thinking TBH.
If you make it multi-poll, you can't control how many options someone picks. It's just that Athlai asked us to vote for 3, but Smith's a ****.EDIT: and how is Dontcloseyoreyes voting for more than three people? I'll just assume my computer is screwing up as per usual.
Sanga > Gilly IMOGilly with 1 and Lara with 2 while Sangakkara has 3..
Bit harsh imo.
Yeah probably so far this decade.Sanga > Gilly IMO
Lara's a little harsh though, I rate Sanga's right up there.