Goughy
Hall of Fame Member
I really can't see any other Test match attack than Clark-Ntini-Murali-Asif tbh. Bond seems to be making the Test sides on his ODI/WC form. Lee shouldn't factor in at all because he's injured and had an ordinary immediate past series and more or less the same with Flintoff. Really Ntini, Clark and Asif are the best Test fast bowlers in the world for mine without question and Murali is Murali.
I think you can sometimes factor in the selection of a certain player to a countries side into another format when they're doing great in the other one, selectors would be silly to neglect the form, but that's where any connection ends imo. They're completely different formats and Bond playing just two Tests since his comeback (albeit doing very well in the first one) means he shouldn't be near a world XI, imo. Especially since Ntini, Asif and Clark have been outstanding in recent times, imo.
Clark and Asif have played 9 tests each and neither have taken 50 Test wickets. Thats not enough games to generate any sort of form or credit to make a World XI."shouldn't be near a world XI"? We all know what he's capable of, he's fit and firing as we saw in the World cup so have to disagree with you on this pasag. He's more dangerous than all 3 of the bowlers you mentioned above imo.
Those numbers show them to be completely unproven, especially Asif whose 9 tests have come in 5 seperate series.
Though Bond isnt much better (only 16 tests and 74 wkts over 5 1/2 years)
Id be looking for more proven candidates than either of those 3 even if they were not the current fashionable choices.
Give me someone with a decent body of work rather than less than 10 games.