Prince EWS
Global Moderator
You can't say he wasn't asking for it though. His post was clearly having a dig at my signature.Cripes...
I've never seen anything like it.
He was asking for a bite and he got one!
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Most over rated players
- Thread starter RedRobin23
- Start date
He was asking for a bite and he got one!
Hoppy1987
U19 Debutant
BittenYou can't say he wasn't asking for it though. His post was clearly having a dig at my signature.
He was asking for a bite and he got one!
marc71178
Eyes not spreadsheets
Prince EWS
Global Moderator
Well, in a thread where someone fits Symonds into my syntax and then pasag is replied to with three giant rolleyeses and a giant rolleyes vomitting regular rolleyeses, no-one is safe.
pasag
RTDAS
You can't say he wasn't asking for it though. His post was clearly having a dig at my signature.
He was asking for a bite and he got one!
Lost for words tbh.
Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
And I'm even more lost for words at you posting a smiley, other than (H)...
Flem274*
123/5
*shocked*Vaas is overated, only useful when it's swinging and totally un-penetrative when it's not
Vaas is brilliant. Full stop.
Anyway, waiting for someone to say Lou Vincent. Whenever he hits good form someone always says he is over rated and crap.
Prince EWS
Global Moderator
Afzaal, Ealham and Chris Harris were rubbish. ODI selection should be reflective of test performances. Economy rates in ODI cricket don't matter - only taking wickets does. Saj Mahmood should be in the England ODI side because he's a wicket taker, and Matt Prior should be in the side because he's a big hitter. For that matter, Hoggard should be in the team because of his test performances. Ireland and Kenya should have test status. Oh, and Anthony McGrath should be in the test team because of his good showings against Zimbabwe.
Did I leave anything out?
Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
It was a joke, my friend. See my post #2 above.
Flem274*
123/5
Ah I see now. Oops. Excuse my foolishness.It was a joke, my friend. See my post #2 above.
Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
Graeme Smith is not the 2nd-best batsman after Bradman... (though it's escaped some people's notice that I haven't suggested he will be for quite a while...)Afzaal, Ealham and Chris Harris were rubbish. ODI selection should be reflective of test performances. Economy rates in ODI cricket don't matter - only taking wickets does. Saj Mahmood should be in the England ODI side because he's a wicket taker, and Matt Prior should be in the side because he's a big hitter. For that matter, Hoggard should be in the team because of his test performances. Ireland and Kenya should have test status. Oh, and Anthony McGrath should be in the test team because of his good showings against Zimbabwe.
Did I leave anything out?
Stephen Harmison was better than Dominic Cork... you certainly missed that.
Now that I think about it, actually, I'm honestly not sure about that one, and it's given me a thought for a poll...
Prince EWS
Global Moderator
Haha, how on earth could I have not said anything about Harmison? Dire.
Prince EWS
Global Moderator
That's probably because he's only over-rated when in good form. When his form subsides, people take his performances into context a bit more and realise that he's simply not that good.
pasag
RTDAS
Re this, I think he should be in this thread. I can't think of anything for the life of me. Chaminda Vaas on the other hand....
Flem274*
123/5
Yeah I'm not sold on Vincent either, but it's interesting to watch the cycle in NZ. Whenever Fleming, McMillan or Vincent make a good score, they're over rated. When they don't it's "drop him, he's useless".
On TV once they analysed Vincent's career and the first half is crap. the second half he improves and is passable, mainly going big score 3 little scores big score 3 little scores etc etc. Then recently he's gone up a gear. He will have to continue in the same vein though for a while to convince me. I hope he does come good because we don't exactly have much else lol.