• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** IPL match discussion thread

Raghav

International Vice-Captain
Warne's over turned the tempo towards to Delhi Daredevils. Hope McGrath continue with his outside offstump bowling!
 

Arjun

Cricketer Of The Year
Another "You're wrong, Ump" moment. A run-out attempt was successful at keeper's end, but umpire Steve Davis refused to refer. Until Sehwag forcefully had the referral done.

Talking of Sehwag, he said after the loss to Chennai that they lacked a fifth bowler, and Amit Mishra came in here. Then why did he have to get himself on? That only turned into a big-hitting opportunity for the Royals.
 

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Another "You're wrong, Ump" moment. A run-out attempt was successful at keeper's end, but umpire Steve Davis refused to refer. Until Sehwag forcefully had the referral done.

Talking of Sehwag, he said after the loss to Chennai that they lacked a fifth bowler, and Amit Mishra came in here. Then why did he have to get himself on? That only turned into a big-hitting opportunity for the Royals.

Mahesh got smashed so Sehwag bowled his remaining quota I guess.
 

four_or_six

Cricketer Of The Year
Shocking umpiring there with the run out but the right decision came in the end so I'm not sure why Delhi were still complaining so much after the end of the game.
 

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Mahesh is their top wicket-taker, and Sehwag was smashed in the last match by Mørkel and now got smashed this time as well, by Watson and Dimi.
Sehwag took 2-0-21-1, Mahesh 2.1-0-35-0.

Obviously Mahesh is the better bowler but that doesn't automatically mean you bowl Mahesh ahead of Sehwag 100% of the time.
 

jeevan

International 12th Man
When Sehwag brought himself on, Amit Mishra had just bowled a succesful first over (4 runs, 1 wicket right after RR were rampaging at 13 an over) and so spin from both ends was a tactic worth trying. Worked for that one over too when he went for only 3 runs. Then Watson cut loose again.

Watson MOTM, first one to string together 3 of them. Is in the top 5 batsmen (by runs) and top 5 bowlers (by wickets) at the moment and so is the first candidate for player of the series.
 

Arjun

Cricketer Of The Year
Sehwag took 2-0-21-1, Mahesh 2.1-0-35-0.

Obviously Mahesh is the better bowler but that doesn't automatically mean you bowl Mahesh ahead of Sehwag 100% of the time.
Mahesh had a few catches dropped off him, and some misfields as well. Moreover, that was Shane Watson batting, and you need your best bowler facing him, not someone smashed for 30 runs in two overs last time around. Besides, they had McGrath and Maharoof as well, so they could have tried both to claim those wickets.
 

Arjun

Cricketer Of The Year
Sid Trivedi had another surprisingly good match now. He may just hold his place in the XI, but questions may be asked about fielding both Munaf and Sid together. Do you need that? Both are average bowlers, and while Sid isn't very powerful or consistent, Munaf has lost a lot of pace and is a liability on th field. Instead, that place can go to a batsman who's very effective on the field, and let the four overs be bowled by Yusuf Pathan with Ravi Jadeja as backup. Something to think about?
 

abhijeet

Cricket Spectator
Sid Trivedi had another surprisingly good match now. He may just hold his place in the XI, but questions may be asked about fielding both Munaf and Sid together. Do you need that? Both are average bowlers, and while Sid isn't very powerful or consistent, Munaf has lost a lot of pace and is a liability on th field. Instead, that place can go to a batsman who's very effective on the field, and let the four overs be bowled by Yusuf Pathan with Ravi Jadeja as backup. Something to think about?
It's a good idea to try different combinations, especially when you're firmly at the top of the table. Rajasthan have done well to try all their players and have some tested bench strength.
 

Nate

You'll Never Walk Alone
Sid Trivedi had another surprisingly good match now. He may just hold his place in the XI, but questions may be asked about fielding both Munaf and Sid together. Do you need that? Both are average bowlers, and while Sid isn't very powerful or consistent, Munaf has lost a lot of pace and is a liability on th field. Instead, that place can go to a batsman who's very effective on the field, and let the four overs be bowled by Yusuf Pathan with Ravi Jadeja as backup. Something to think about?
Can't say I've agreed with any of your posts in this thread. Both are going at about 7.7 an over, which is a very acceptable rate and both (especially Trivedi) have picked up key wickets. Warne is getting the most out of them and to change a winning, top of the table formula now seems really silly.
 

Top