Top_Cat
Request Your Custom Title Now!
The force is strong with this one.Somebody in cricketweb saying
'player X >>>>>>>>>>> player Y.
Then, Richard coming along and saying 'No, as a matter of fact
player X >>>>>> player Y'.
The force is strong with this one.Somebody in cricketweb saying
'player X >>>>>>>>>>> player Y.
Then, Richard coming along and saying 'No, as a matter of fact
player X >>>>>> player Y'.
The force is strong with this one.
I would appreciate that anything that was played in the 21st century don't play it.I guess in future the TV companies should ring you and check if you have seen the match before they show it
I tell you what, Iain O'Brien's better than Player X.Somebody in cricketweb saying
'player X >>>>>>>>>>> player Y.
Then, Richard coming along and saying 'No, as a matter of fact
player X >>>>>> player Y'.
Michael Atherton deeply regretted declaring on Graeme Hick to deny him a century. And that was in a match that England did need to win.Teams who bat on so their players can reach milestones, rather than having a crack at victory.
Sure, India might well have not bowled us out, but with 53 overs left at lunch, they could have set an aggressive field and had a go. But no, let Yuvraj and Gamhir ton up (which they didn't anyway, so the whole thing was a waste of time). It's times like this when you can understand why people find cricket boring - two days ago this was a fascinating match, what a piece of **** of a last day. India had nothing to lose.
first chance averagePlayers getting dropped by fielders, then going on to score a shedload more
Was about to admonish you for using the phrase then remembered Dicko's banned.first chance average
One better...Mark Taylor's use of the term 'at bat'
Cricket, Tubs, not baseball.
Association football might demur at the suggestion that's a baseball term.Every thing in cricket that's a reference to baseball
Dug-out, batter, at bat. FFS.
Woah, how come?Was about to admonish you for using the phrase then remembered Dicko's banned.