NZTailender
I can't believe I ate the whole thing
Michael Clarke.
NiceVirender Sehwag.
Go on, name me a part-timer who was a patch on Giles
Virender Sehwag.
Chris Gayle.
Aaron Redmond
Mark Waugh
Carl Hooper
Graeme Hick
Hahahaha. So completely owned.Michael Clarke.
And Sanath Jayasuriya!Forgot to mention Simon Katich, Michael Vaughan, Michael Bevan and Darren Lehmann.
He definitely doesn't give the ball a great tweak. It's always quite difficult to tell how much is the dead pitch and how much is the ability to turn the ball, but i'd say if you look at Panesar's career, he's turned the ball at times when spinners on the opposite team didn't- Vettori at OT, Harris at Edgebaston. Obviously he wasn't very effective in the latter, and that's because he's a pretty poor bowler. But in terms of getting turn he's well ahead of Giles.And no, I don't think he failed to get turn out of pitches most fingerspinners (eg, Swann or MSP) would get turn out of. Not at all. I think lots of the false expectations about MSP would never have been got-up if he'd played some of his early Tests on the pitches Giles was repeatedly wrongly selected on in 2002 and 2003.
Virender Sehwag.
Chris Gayle.
Aaron Redmond
Mark Waugh
Carl Hooper
Graeme Hick
Michael Clarke.
Forgot to mention Simon Katich, Michael Vaughan, Michael Bevan and Darren Lehmann.
And Sanath Jayasuriya!
Taibu (and he's also a better keeper than Ashley Giles)
Grant Flower
Not really. Of the 14 mentioned, Sehwag, Redmond, Mark Waugh (who was a very poor spinner though decent seamer), Clarke, Hick, Katich, Bevan, Vaughan, Gayle and Taibu don't come remotely close, they were\are all very poor indeed. Most of them struggle to pitch the ball in the same place five times an over, the two who can (Clarke and Gayle) spin it even less than Giles and have less variation.Hahahaha. So completely owned.
I don't think he's well ahead at all. And I'm absolutely 100% confident in saying that MSP would've got nothing out of the surfaces Giles got wrongly selected on in 2002 and 2003.He definitely doesn't give the ball a great tweak. It's always quite difficult to tell how much is the dead pitch and how much is the ability to turn the ball, but i'd say if you look at Panesar's career, he's turned the ball at times when spinners on the opposite team didn't- Vettori at OT, Harris at Edgebaston. Obviously he wasn't very effective in the latter, and that's because he's a pretty poor bowler. But in terms of getting turn he's well ahead of Giles.
Plenty, back in 1998. We always told him not to give-up his day-job (ie, batting).How much of Redmond have you seen, out of interest?
*Victorian tailendersHave probably mentioned this numerous times.
Tailenders scoring runs.