OverratedSanity
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Used to be Harbhajan or Hooper. Probably Bairstow now.
Think he will.Latham won't reach 100
The amount of talented cricketers that finished their career with 90-99 Test matches is insane ..I mean every 100 test player is. Someone is still the least awesome, and as a Fleming fan and defender, he's in the batting conversation.
Otherwise it's clearly Lee or Ishant until Bairstow comes in.
Nah, Harbhajan still makes like top 40-50 spinners...... Bairstow is the worst, followed by Ishant then Harbhajan and Strauss.Bairstow better than Harbhajan.
Harbhajan defo the worst
He is definitely in the league of Zaheer Khan and Srinath, just below Shami. His late career peak was great, as was his youth years. I would say his overall average of 32 is alright considering everything. Bairstow had two good years with the bat; and everything else he has been a burden. His glovework isn't even good enough really....Ishant averaged 36.5 with the ball from 2007 to 2017 and had no secondary skillset. Late peak came when numerous pace bowlers were taking wickets for fun.
Both the openers are better than Strauss. Mallik is better than Ganguly and Bell; and Vaas definitely deserves better. Ntini is a better shout. Vettori is probably the worst pick though; he carried NZ bowling and batting for years. And man, again Southee over Ntini??100 Test 11 of Averageness. Updated for upcoming tests.
atherton
Warner
Fleming (c)
hooper
malik
bairstow (Wk)
vettori
Southee
Singh
Sharma
Vaas
Obviously his final average is alright. But I would have Zak, Shami, Srinath a tier ahead of Ishant without having to think.He is definitely in the league of Zaheer Khan and Srinath, just below Shami. His late career peak was great, as was his youth years. I would say his overall average of 32 is alright considering everything. Bairstow had two good years with the bat; and everything else he has been a burden. His glovework isn't even good enough really....
I am not saying Ishant is much ahead of Bairstow; but Bairstow really has been mediocre for the most part. And his keeping skills were never truly great; they were serviceable at best.Obviously his final average is alright. But I would have Zak, Shami, Srinath a tier ahead of Ishant without having to think.
Bairstow did offer a second skillset before he broke his leg. He was a decent test keeper, and above average keeper/bat.
Hooper was an ATG slipper and handy bowler too. He's been mentioned as a candidate.
Don't mind who you think is worse. I always thought Bairstow's keeping was decent enough, unlike Buttler who was not a test standard gloveman.I am not saying Ishant is much ahead of Bairstow; but Bairstow really has been mediocre for the most part. And his keeping skills were never truly great; they were serviceable at best.
AthertonAnyways, here comes my Rankings of every player with a 100 Test till date (Bairstow will join at the bottom rung):
1. Sachin Tendulkar
2. Glenn McGrath
3. Steve Smith
4. Brian Lara
5. Shane Warne
6. Muttiah Muralitharan
7. Sunil Gavaskar
8. Viv Richards
9. Wasim Akram
10. Jacques Kallis
11. Kumar Sangakkara
12. Allan Border
13. Steve Waugh
14. Ian Botham
15. Shaun Pollock
16. Rahul Dravid
17. Ricky Ponting
18. Courtney Walsh
19. Javed Miandad
20. Kapil Dev
21. A B de Villiers
22. Anil Kumble
23. James Anderson
24. Joe Root
25. Virat Kohli
26. Younis Khan
27. Geoff Boycott
28. Graeme Smith
29. Clive Lloyd
30. Gordon Greenidge
31. Nathan Lyon
32. Shivnarine Chanderpaul
33. Stuart Broad
34. Matthew Hayden
35. Virendra Sehwag
36. Inzamam-ul-Haq
37. Alaistar Cook
38. V V S Laxman
39. Michael Clarke
40. Hashim Amla
41. Kevin Pietersen
42. Colin Cowdrey
43. Graham Gooch
44. Ben Stokes
45. Ian Healy
46. Mahela Jayawardene
47. David Gower
48. Gary Kirsten
49. Chamunda Vaas
50. David Boon
51. Graham Thorpe
52. Mark Waugh
53. Justin Langer
54. Daniel Vettori
55. Dilip Vengsarkar
56. Ross Taylor
57. Cheteshwar Pujara
58. Mark Taylor
59. Alec Stewart
60. Makhaya Ntini
61. Brendon McCullum
62. Angelo Mathews
63. Chris Gayle
64. Saleem Malik
65. Desmond Haynes
66. David Warner
67. Sanath Jayasuriya
68. Ian Bell
69. Sourav Ganguly
70. Mike Atherton
71. Mark Boucher
72. Stephen Fleming
73. Carl Hooper
74. Andrew Strauss
75. Harbhajan Singh
76. Ishant Sharma
Yeah seems about fair; but including either of Vaas or Vettori feels kinda wrong somehow.....Atherton
Strauss
Fleming
Bell
Ganguly
Hooper
Boucher
Vettori/Vaas
Singh
Sharma
Ntini
Would be your team based on that, with Bairstow coming in for either Boucher or Bell imminently.
I mean the 90s bowling is literally made up of Steyn, Ambrose, Herath and Willis; and they also have the two biggest utility players in history in Garry Sobers and Adam Gilchrist.....It’s a decent lineup, but if you put it up against the XI that retired in the 90-cap region, I’m backing the 90s - by some distance!