dont think thats a major worry, he has just played 2 tests & is currently in one..a massive zebra said:He should be more concerned with getting his bowling form back to the indisputable brilliance of 2005. So far this year its been woeful - averaging 62.
If we're talking women then Lara's test high score might be in danger.Voltman said:Of runs? Or women?
andyc said:Seeing Shane Warne hit a 100 for Australia is quite possibly the thing I want to see the most in cricket, if anything because it'd be great to see him celebrate it. As stupid as it sounds, I daresay it'd be hard to make him retire without a century. When you see him bat, you get the feeling that if he'd applied himself as much to his batting as he had to his bowling, he could have an average a lot better than his current 16. And hey, if AA can get a century, surely Warnie can.
Excuse me for my ignorance but who is AA?silentstriker said:Let Warne find his way in the game, before confronting the greatness that is AA.
Haha what? Every time I watch him bat, I just wonder "how does he friggin score runs?" Worst technique ever, but somehow, just through being the all conquering Shane Warne, he manages to score runs.andyc said:When you see him bat, you get the feeling that if he'd applied himself as much to his batting as he had to his bowling, he could have an average a lot better than his current 16.
Ajit Agarkar. He's a gimmick around here, what can I say, people love alliteration.Perm said:Excuse me for my ignorance but who is AA?
I hope that Warne does score a test century for Australia but the chances of it happening are very slim indeed.
That's what she said.......loves working through the leg does Warney