• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Why is it viewed as more important

Starfighter

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
It definitely sounds like an anecdote tbh, “I only ever saw Simpson drop one chance”
I'm guessing that was from Benaud's playing days too, not his entire career. In two tests' worth of highlights from 77/78 he drops at least three, plus a dolly at mid-off. His one-handed technique didn't work so well in his forties. Of course Benaud wasn't watching then as he went to broadcast WSC.
 

ankitj

Hall of Fame Member
Sobers' bowling > Imran's batting quite easily.
I think Imran's batting >= Sobers' bowling. Very difficult to consider Sobers' bowling better. It's the primary discipline where Sobers edges Imran. Overall, it's very marginally in Sobers' favour. I think I myself allow "expert opinion" and "peer rating" to impact my call here. Can see why someone might rate Imran higher too.
 

Bolo.

International Captain
>ignored


>heart reacc
Essentially the same number of runs, but a very different conclusion on the value of the runs.

I think 16/17 runs may be overestimating the runs saved- a team with a great slip is usually going to have a good one too. Still handy though- maybe someone like Mark Waugh is handier than everyone but the best bats from his era.
 

Coronis

International Coach
I'm guessing that was from Benaud's playing days too, not his entire career. In two tests' worth of highlights from 77/78 he drops at least three, plus a dolly at mid-off. His one-handed technique didn't work so well in his forties. Of course Benaud wasn't watching then as he went to broadcast WSC.
Yeah I don’t doubt his greatness in general but that specifically is more of an anecdotal thing.
 

kyear2

International Coach
I'm guessing that was from Benaud's playing days too, not his entire career. In two tests' worth of highlights from 77/78 he drops at least three, plus a dolly at mid-off. His one-handed technique didn't work so well in his forties. Of course Benaud wasn't watching then as he went to broadcast WSC.
To be fair, he was old and away from the game for how long?

Screenshot_2024-04-22-07-39-44-39_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
I think Imran's batting >= Sobers' bowling. Very difficult to consider Sobers' bowling better. It's the primary discipline where Sobers edges Imran. Overall, it's very marginally in Sobers' favour. I think I myself allow "expert opinion" and "peer rating" to impact my call here. Can see why someone might rate Imran higher too.
Agreed
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I think Imran's batting >= Sobers' bowling. Very difficult to consider Sobers' bowling better. It's the primary discipline where Sobers edges Imran. Overall, it's very marginally in Sobers' favour. I think I myself allow "expert opinion" and "peer rating" to impact my call here. Can see why someone might rate Imran higher too.
I think Sobers' peak period where he was picking up 4 wpm @27 Avg for a good 7 years or so is significantly better than Imran's peak as a batsman . Imran's peak had the averages of a top quality batsman without the same level of run production (usually low runs/match or runs/series). Sobers' peak combined both good average and output of wickets of a very good bowler.

1713794034266.png

 

Attachments

Last edited:

smash84

The Tiger King
I think Sobers' peak period where he was picking up 4 wpm @27 Avg for a good 7 years or so is significantly better than Imran's peak as a batsman . Imran's peak had the averages of a top quality batsman without the same level of run production (usually low runs/match or runs/series). Sobers' peak combined both good average and output of wickets of a very good bowler.

View attachment 40029

Makes me wonder how bad Sobers was outside this peak to average 35 overall.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
I think Sobers' peak period where he was picking up 4 wpm @27 Avg for a good 7 years or so is significantly better than Imran's peak as a batsman . Imran's peak had the averages of a top quality batsman without the same level of run production (usually low runs/match or runs/series). Sobers' peak combined both good average and output of wickets of a very good bowler.

View attachment 40029

Imran bat 89 to 91 > Sobers bowler 61 to 68 > Imran bat 80 to 88 > Sobers bowler 69 to 74 > Imran bat 71 to 79 = Sobers bowler 54 to 60
 

kyear2

International Coach
I think Sobers' peak period where he was picking up 4 wpm @27 Avg for a good 7 years or so is significantly better than Imran's peak as a batsman . Imran's peak had the averages of a top quality batsman without the same level of run production (usually low runs/match or runs/series). Sobers' peak combined both good average and output of wickets of a very good bowler.

View attachment 40029

Yeah, as a bowler Sobers was just ahead of Imran as a batsman, as discussed above Imran's average was quite soft and not representative of output.

As an overall cricketer? Sobers was comfortably ahead on primary skill and when his slip fielding is included it's quite comfortable.

A top 3 or 4 batsman, a bowler of unmatched versatility and possibly a top 5 slip fielder in one package is just stupid.

With regards to how atrocious he was outside of his peak? Well that was between the ages of 17 and 20 when he was bowling his least effective style of bowling and acclimatizing to an adults game, and near the end of a career where he broke down a little from being a top order batsman while bowling more overs in his test and FC career than Imran did.

With regards to his Pakistan record, one such series is where he scored his triple hundred, and Hanif his as well on pitches that were 1930's flat. Pretty sure he was still blowing spin as well.

That's not to mention that Fazal, a world class seamer averaged 38 with a s/r of 96 in the Caribbean.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
He is a bowling all-rounder after all. Think of this is as better than Jadeja in last 5-6 years. And Imran's good phase can be said to have lasted 10 years.

View attachment 40033
Yes, I'm talking about production though. Imran was less than 50 runs per test in this period which is far far below the output of a proper specialist batsman's contribution. The average is eye popping, but actual output is not as impressive as Sobers taking 4 wickets a game.

Part of it is workload too. Sobers, a batting all rounder was bowling more overs a game than Imran, a bowling all rounder.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
With regards to how atrocious he was outside of his peak? Well that was between the ages of 17 and 20 when he was bowling his least effective style of bowling and acclimatizing to an adults game, and near the end of a career where he broke down a little from being a top order batsman while bowling more overs in his test and FC career than Imran did.

With regards to his Pakistan record, one such series is where he scored his triple hundred, and Hanif his as well on pitches that were 1930's flat. Pretty sure he was still blowing spin as well.

That's not to mention that Fazal, a world class seamer averaged 38 with a s/r of 96 in the Caribbean.
Just noting the ease you are able to contextualise the gaps and blemishes in Sobers' record yet not Imran's.
 

kyear2

International Coach

Never read this before today, but it's basically straight forward to anyone who watches the game and who observed those two great teams in history.

Anyways, since very few are likely to read it...



Screenshot_2024-04-22-13-08-16-70_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member

Never read this before today, but it's basically straight forward to anyone who watches the game and who observed those two great teams in history.

Anyways, since very few are likely to read it...



View attachment 40034
Irrelevant because you havent given examples of how this will practically affect your selection in an ATG team.
 

Socerer 01

International Captain

Never read this before today, but it's basically straight forward to anyone who watches the game and who observed those two great teams in history.

Anyways, since very few are likely to read it...



View attachment 40034
idk who even knew of this publication before
 

Top