Why Australia have lost the Ashes

[marc71178]

3-3 and 2-5 are a differential of just 2 matches. Rather close.

2 matches is close in a sample of 50, but out of 7, it's not.

 

[C_C]

poor show C_C, shame you arent as clever as you first appeared.

You asked me to define a word without using it or its synonyms and i have.
Any questions ?
If you wish to defend a rather elementary error ( such as defining a word with itself), then you are simply arguing for the hell of it without any substance.

 

[C_C]

2 matches is close in a sample of 50, but out of 7, it's not.

Fine. Fair enough
By the same logic, 4-4 is nowhere the same as 9-5.

 

[sledger]

You asked me to define a word without using it or its synonyms and i have.
Any questions ?
If you wish to defend a rather elementary error ( such as defining a word with itself), then you are simply arguing for the hell of it without any substance.

pot kettle black

 

[C_C]

pot kettle black

I have shown there is substance to my assertion that England has to do a lot more to be considered a clear #2. You however, are simply arguing meaningless linguistic idiocies just for the hell of it.

 

[Neil Pickup]

Can someone close down this thread now? I think it's run its course.

I think it's run a long way past its course.

(And congratulations for displaying correct use of apostrophes in "its" and "it's". Nothing annoys me more than a rogue apostrophe.)