correction..martyn hasnt scored a hundred for..oooo....a few minutes nowSanz said:And martyn has not scored a century in last 2 years, not to forget the fact that he has played 62 % of his matches at home as opposed to Gangus who is at about 43 %.
His Career Avg is 41+ (34 against Australia) which is better than many current English, Pakistani, West Indian, South African, Kiwi bastmmen.marc71178 said:Depends on which side you're talking about.
If he were West Indian, Australian or South African (or possibly even English or Pakistani) with that as a career average - no thanks.
Hahaha - He heard me. Congratulation to him at last it came and what a place to score a century.Swervy said:correction..martyn hasnt scored a hundred for..oooo....a few minutes now
Sometimes, it doesn't take a brutal personality to succeed.ReallyCrazy said:IDravid is too nice. He is too soft spoken. He cannot motivate a team.
Yes, but I was refuting that an average of 34 is that good, and that it would keep him in an International side, as you claimed.Sanz said:His Career Avg is 41+ (34 against Australia) which is better than many current English, Pakistani, West Indian, South African, Kiwi bastmmen.
Well 34 is his avg against Australia comparing that to Kallis (35.58), Gary Kirsten (34.36), Gibbs (32.38), Fleming (28.17), Youhana (28.33), Butcher(33), Inzi (37), Hussain (38), Tresco (29)..list can go on for ever.marc71178 said:Yes, but I was refuting that an average of 34 is that good, and that it would keep him in an International side, as you claimed.
coz the thread is about gangulySanz said:Well 34 is his avg against Australia comparing that to Kallis (35.58), Gary Kirsten (34.36), Gibbs (32.38), Fleming (28.17), Youhana (28.33), Butcher(33), Inzi (37), Hussain (38), Tresco (29)..list can go on for ever.
I said an avg of 34 against australia and over 41 is good enough to play at international level. There are many who are worse than Gangs and still playing for their country why single him out ?
No, you said an average of 34 was good enough to play Internationals - I dispute that for most sides.Sanz said:I said an avg of 34 against australia and over 41 is good enough to play at international level.
Not nessacarly.Arjun said:Even Sachin or Kumble will make a good captain- why not have your best player or a good bowler setting an example for the rest of the team?
I fully agree. These comments should be forwarded to the Indian selection committee.AS a batsmen he's overrated, as a captain he is unimpressive, partcularly when India rae down he's short of ideas.
In short he's the most arrogant pig-headed fellow i've ever seen in Cricket.
He was very young. Young captains are unstable. Look at Graeme Smith. Do you consider him to be a good captain? Evidence that young captains are quite unstable.Tendulkar had two bites of the cherry as captain and achieved no worse then Ganguly.
Why not? Those victories mean a lot. That is why everyone is praising Ricky Ponting. Didn't we hear so much about the pressure on Ponting being Waugh's successor? Didn't we hear a lot of those stories? You cannot question quality. Ponting is, and Ganguly isn't.Typical bunch of Indians (no mean to offend), if he won the WC, the series in Australia and the VB Series you lot would be singing his praises.
Against whom? The West Indians? They're one of the worst teams away from home and did not look like winning a match in South Africa.well he certainly impressed me 6 months ago
no..England..and I would say England are roughly in the same region as India are in terms of strengthArjun said:Against whom? The West Indians? They're one of the worst teams away from home and did not look like winning a match in South Africa.