• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Who was the better bowler: Glenn Mcgrath or Wasim Akram?

Who was the better bowler: Glenn Mcgrath or Wasim Akram?


  • Total voters
    73
  • Poll closed .

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
They kind of do, even right down to the Under Xs.

If you drop a couple in the slips, you get moved out. Drop them in the field you get moved where catches don't go. If the team has a shocker the coach would have you do some fielding practice.

So if your whole team continues to be ****, it's got to be a mental thing where they don't really care, are not actually being in a state of mind ready to take a catch every ball, and that is not something you can really chop and change players for.
There are plenty of fat ****s who field in slips in local cricket who never get moved because they are not mobile enough to field anywhere else. They are often horrendous in the slips and don't touch anything that isn't hit straight to them and even them drop it half the time
 

_00_deathscar

International Regular
I read a research article somewhere which suggested fuller you bowl, more the strain you put on your back and we all know you have to bowl very full to generate swing. No wonder back of the length bowlers like McGrath, Walsh have longer careers compared to Bond, Harris etc
Yes that 160+ test career Jimmy is known for his back of the length bowling and vicious bouncers.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
I read a research article somewhere which suggested fuller you bowl, more the strain you put on your back and we all know you have to bowl very full to generate swing. No wonder back of the length bowlers like McGrath, Walsh have longer careers compared to Bond, Harris etc
But Wasim did bowl a lot of yorkers and remained fit enough to play for 17 years?
 

Starfighter

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I read a research article somewhere which suggested fuller you bowl, more the strain you put on your back and we all know you have to bowl very full to generate swing. No wonder back of the length bowlers like McGrath, Walsh have longer careers compared to Bond, Harris etc
You remember the article? I got quite a few articles on bowling biomechanics and that detail ain't in them.
 

Flem274*

123/5
Jimmy doesn't bowl as full as you'd think since 2008 though and the stats away from the duke ball reflect this. He's very good at sitting in the good length corridor. It's crucial to his knack for bowling dry when nothing is happening.

I was gonna refute with Southee and Boult instead, but on the rare occasion they get a proper injury it's a back injury, so maybe the paper was onto something.
 

Top