harsh.ag
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Yup, this is a great poll resultLove the even distribution. There's no other side that will have such an even contest been these many contenders for the title of the best batsman.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e98be/e98be10c942d68734b8b1bfd8ac9a71e078394cd" alt="Original :) :)"
Yup, this is a great poll resultLove the even distribution. There's no other side that will have such an even contest been these many contenders for the title of the best batsman.
England might be close as well; Hobbs, Hammond and Grace all have their admirers, and I'm sure we'd get the odd deluded Pietersen vote too. Certainly nothing like this though, admittedly.Yup, this is a great poll resultMaybe South Africa might have a similar 3-way fight between Graeme Pollock, Barry Richards, and Jacques Kallis if we have a poll.
Ya I know, But if we can rate Sydney Barnes on them, so we can George Headley.Haha, Lancashire League ain't FC cricket.
I always figured that Hobbs was undisputed in English history. Many may disagree, but I am pretty sure he would be ahead by a margin in a poll.England might be close as well; Hobbs, Hammond and Grace all have their admirers, and I'm sure we'd get the odd deluded Pietersen vote too. Certainly nothing like this though, admittedly.
yep, very evenly distributed. A testament to the skills of WI players over the years. There is no undisputed king despite all of them being once in a generation playersLove the even distribution. There's no other side that will have such an even contest been these many contenders for the title of the best batsman.
A Keynesian, I assume?I think that Viv was clearly better than Lara, and since those are the only two I have seen bat, my vote goes to Viv.
Thank you for the warm welcome mate. Yup, I am a lifelong KeynesianA Keynesian, I assume?
Welcome to CW mate.
That is a pretty amazing tribute to the man, fred.. And gotta say it makes me rate him even more now, considering how good his bowling was as a medium pacer from all that I ve read as well.Headley's difficulty is that more than half his Test runs were scored against England attacks shorn of their top bowlers so I ruled him out.
I voted for Sobers because I was fortunate enough to see him bat and he was quite outstanding - he lived life to the full, and generally burned the candle at both ends and played more cricket than he should have - had he had the mindset of Bradman, and played the same amount of cricket and bowled as often as The Don, then I think he'd have had the same batting average as the great man.
There was a spell during the "Super Test" when Lara and Dravid were batting in the second innings for the World XI against Warne and if there was another left hander who could have batted the way Lara did with Warne in that form on that track, I have missed out on something great.. IMO, those were conditions when no leftie would have been able to stay in for 30 mins against Warne, forget about scoring runs and Lara was doing both and looking at ease doing all that. Awesome doesn't even begin to describe how good he was at certain times...I agree with the first part, at his best I don't think B.C. Lara had an equal, but apparently the same was said about Sobers and Sobers was more consistent. But the fact that Lara tamed the two greatest spinners of all time and produced 4 or 5 amazing innings againts one of the greatest attacks ever is just hard to ignore.
All four are just top class, gold tier.