wackyadz06
Cricket Spectator
Broad is very good agree , asif is good so monty
what you think of ed joyce
what you think of ed joyce
Hasn't done anything of any note in his ODI performances so far, and that leave the other day was laughably idiotic.wackyadz06 said:what you think of ed joyce
Oh, the joy of "merge threads".AussieDominance said:what happened to me putting clarke?
probably because he cant bat or field?shortpitched713 said:Panesar is the best up and coming player of the current crop. He's the first genuine spin talent England have had for a long time. Much better than that Giles bloke. I don't understand why they don't play him in one-dayers...
Its interesting that you state that Pietersen is a certain starter, hence cant be amongst the 'up and coming' and then include mohammad Asif, whos probably the first bowler on the pakistan team sheet in both forms of the game, on your listMr Mxyzptlk said:And? He still isn't a must-pick for the SA first XI. Pietersen is a certain starter for England. Hence, established. Worth noting that Neil McKenzie has played 23 more Tests than Pietersen. For that matter, Ramprakash has played 34 more.
Why don't you define what "up-and-coming" means for all of us? Certainly don't seem very sure of it yourself based on the players you listed there.Mr Mxyzptlk said:In what way is Hussey up-and-coming (or upcoming)?
actually a lot of people- bob willis and david lloyd in particular were comparing him to viv richards even before he set foot in the test arena. the number of people that yelled "Viv" after his front foot hook for 6 off gillespie in the ODIs last summer were probably a fair few. Not that he deserves to be compared to Sir Viv of course, considering that he hasnt accomplished anything in his career yet.Langeveldt said:I'd say Pietersen was established.. When you're being compared to Viv Richards, thats a sign you are no longer a n00b..
I'll give you Giles being more useful in ODIs than Monty, but as for the other two I'm not fully convinced that they deserve a spot as sole spinner on the team. They both bat well, but from what I've seen Dalrymple looks distinctly ordinary with the ball. Yardy looks to have potential with the ball, but I don't think we've seen enough of him at this level to make a judgement. Anyways, as Giles' fitness is up in the air, I don't think I would be too comfortable going with only one decentish spinner, especially on pitches that might turn more.tooextracool said:probably because he cant bat or field?
When it comes to ODIs his bowling isnt significantly better than Giles, Yardy, Dalrymple and the rest all of whom are much better fielders and batsmen.
Of the guys I've seen, Fulton looked good but the Kiwis simply dont play enough to get a roll on.NZTailender said:[NZ Fan Bias]Ryder, Taylor, Gillespie, Fulton, J McMillan, N McCullum, J Patel, J How[/NZ Fan Bias]