• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Who had the best natural talent?

Most talented cricketer?


  • Total voters
    21

Thala_0710

International Regular
“Natural talent refers to an innate or inborn aptitude or ability in a specific area, allowing someone to demonstrate some immediate skill without practice, or to gain skill rapidly with minimal practice

Given this, none of the modern day blokes qualify.
Dravid in an interview said about Sachin that quite a few times that when they were in the middle, and a bowler was giving them issues, Sachin could completely change his approach wrt to the shot selection, what guard to take, stepping down or any other approach etc. right in the middle of the game, in a way which Dravid said, even other great batters, including himself, would require months of practice in the nets.
That's just natural talent I feel.
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
Dravid in an interview said about Sachin that quite a few times that when they were in the middle, and a bowler was giving them issues, Sachin could completely change his approach wrt to the shot selection, what guard to take, stepping down or any other approach etc. right in the middle of the game, in a way which Dravid said, even other great batters, including himself, would require months of practice in the nets.
That's just natural talent I feel.
Starting at 16 as a huge child prodigy, then by some strange twist of fate, actually living up to the hype (practically unheard of) and some, and retiring 23 years later as arguably the second Greatest Batsman of All Time, definitely requires a fair deal of Natural talent.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Starting at 16 as a huge child prodigy, then by some strange twist of fate, actually living up to the hype (practically unheard of) and some, and retiring 23 years later as arguably the second Greatest Batsman of All Time, definitely requires a fair deal of Natural talent.
Yeah the only comparable case will be if Rachin retires with a 50+ average in Tests, 45+ average in ODIs after a 18 year career.
 

Migara

International Coach
Dravid in an interview said about Sachin that quite a few times that when they were in the middle, and a bowler was giving them issues, Sachin could completely change his approach wrt to the shot selection, what guard to take, stepping down or any other approach etc. right in the middle of the game, in a way which Dravid said, even other great batters, including himself, would require months of practice in the nets.
That's just natural talent I feel.
This is the same for Aravinda and Inzamam. They lacked Tendulkar's discipline, and it reflects in the average
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Dravid in an interview said about Sachin that quite a few times that when they were in the middle, and a bowler was giving them issues, Sachin could completely change his approach wrt to the shot selection, what guard to take, stepping down or any other approach etc. right in the middle of the game, in a way which Dravid said, even other great batters, including himself, would require months of practice in the nets.
That's just natural talent I feel.
His adaptability was a gift but I think it wasn't a natural physical gift per se.
 

Top