Yes and he tends to play the ball away from the body as well.What do you see as unorthodox about Kohli's technique? It seems pretty orthodox to me. Smith I can understand with the big walk across to off and those exaggerated movements which make him look weird, but I don't get that with Kohli tbh. I can see how he goes harder at the ball than an older school player and plays out in front a bit, but I don't think him unorthodox. Actually Smith, whose technique looks weird AF actually plays the ball much later than Kohli imo, as do Root and Williamson.
This post works for me on so many levels.........In mid 2001 when Brian Lara was 32 years old, his average was below 50, it was 47.68 after 80 Tests. He had only scored 15 hundreds at that point in his career.
Lara was accused by some of not always taking the game seriously, or having his head screwed on properly. You'd think his technique wouldn't of held up the older he got. You wouldn't of been re-missed to think that his best days were behind him at that point.
Lara then went onto a huge run, scored 19 hundreds in his final 50 Tests. Averaged over 60 in that period.
Kohli is 33 years old. It'd be naïve to think Kohli couldn't rise again in a similar vein.
Kohli's lack of backfoot game is the reason, really. At his peak, he could off both feet but since 2018, he seems to have decided all "muh cover drives" and totally given up on playing back. If he can crack that side of his game again (and signs have been good under Dravid), I think he will back to his old self.What do you see as unorthodox about Kohli's technique? It seems pretty orthodox to me. Smith I can understand with the big walk across to off and those exaggerated movements which make him look weird, but I don't get that with Kohli tbh. I can see how he goes harder at the ball than an older school player and plays out in front a bit, but I don't think him unorthodox. Actually Smith, whose technique looks weird AF actually plays the ball much later than Kohli imo, as do Root and Williamson.
Yeah, that basically implies they were that fit in their 50s, right?I don't know Kohli crazy fitness regime may have contributed in his decline maybe the best fitness regime for a batsman is still just old school running laps of the ground in high volumes.
I know someone who regularly has dinners with Misbah and he said Misbah eats like crazy never takes bread though but ensures a 10k run 5-6 days a week he was informed YK also followed a similar traing regime and they were able to maintain their peaks past their 40 even with dodgy Pakistani birth certificates
He's always batted this way. As alluded to above, his decline has to do with him not being in the right headspace more than anything.Kohli's main issue that I've seen is his hands are following the ball.
Virat never had a backfoot game if you leave aside his pull/hooks. I have never seen him playing backfoot drives.Kohli's lack of backfoot game is the reason, really. At his peak, he could off both feet but since 2018, he seems to have decided all "muh cover drives" and totally given up on playing back. If he can crack that side of his game again (and signs have been good under Dravid), I think he will back to his old self.
Almost all of the other best batsmen right now do play off the backfoot more than the front foot. At his best, that set Virat apart but still think he needs to have the option of playing off the backfoot at the very least, even if that is not his first instinct or trigger.
The difference being that the game has changed a lot, it's become far more performance oriented and competitive.In mid 2001 when Brian Lara was 32 years old, his average was below 50, it was 47.68 after 80 Tests. He had only scored 15 hundreds at that point in his career.
Lara was accused by some of not always taking the game seriously, or having his head screwed on properly. You'd think his technique wouldn't of held up the older he got. You wouldn't of been re-missed to think that his best days were behind him at that point.
Lara then went onto a huge run, scored 19 hundreds in his final 50 Tests. Averaged over 60 in that period.
Kohli is 33 years old. It'd be naïve to think Kohli couldn't rise again in a similar vein.
Tendulkar tops all. Whatever happens, Kohli will end up rated higher than Sehwag and Inzi. VVS better than MoYo for me. Misbah should be there perhaps.In Tests
- Gavaskar
- Tendulkar
- Sangakara
- Dravid
- Miandad
- Younis Khan
- Sehwag
- Inzamam
- Kohli
- Hanif
- Aravinda
- Hazare
- Anwar
- MoYo
- VVS
- Mahela
- Viswanath
- Zaheer
- Umrigar
- Jayasurya
Pretty good list though Sachin is tops for me I find it difficult to separate Dravid , Sanga also Miandad and YK are dead even for me .Nice to see Hanif and Arvinda this high both get to fly under the radar a bit .Salim malik & Azharuddin were also couple of blokes who I thought were terrific but not sure who they can replace here probably I will take them over Umrigar and Jayasuriya at the last 2 spotsIn Tests
- Gavaskar
- Tendulkar
- Sangakara
- Dravid
- Miandad
- Younis Khan
- Sehwag
- Inzamam
- Kohli
- Hanif
- Aravinda
- Hazare
- Anwar
- MoYo
- VVS
- Mahela
- Viswanath
- Zaheer
- Umrigar
- Jayasurya
If the price is rightSalim malik & Azharuddin were also couple of blokes who I thought were terrific but not sure who they can replace here probably I will take them over Umrigar and Jayasuriya at the last 2 spots
Pretty good list though Sachin is tops for me I find it difficult to separate Dravid , Sanga also Miandad and YK are dead even for me .Nice to see Hanif and Arvinda this high both get to fly under the radar a bit .Salim malik & Azharuddin were also couple of blokes who I thought were terrific but not sure who they can reach here
Haha yeah that a big black mark on both but on pure batsmanship both were pure artists.If the price is right