-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
What 3 players would u want exchanged from ur team?
- Thread starter delkap
- Start date
Deja moo
International Captain
I dont see why Yuvi and Flintoff are being eqauted.
Yuvraj is a better bat than Flintoff ( ok , theyre equal at best)
Flintoff is a better bowler than Yuvraj.. ( even if Yuvraj bowled regularly , you couldnt compare a medium pacer to a left arm spinner )
Yuvraj > Flintoff in fielding.
2 vastly different players.......why swap them ?
Yuvraj is a better bat than Flintoff ( ok , theyre equal at best)
Flintoff is a better bowler than Yuvraj.. ( even if Yuvraj bowled regularly , you couldnt compare a medium pacer to a left arm spinner )
Yuvraj > Flintoff in fielding.
2 vastly different players.......why swap them ?
Last edited:
Mr Mxyzptlk
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Relevance? He was stating that the rules of the thread stipulate trading like for like players and both Martyn and Tendulkar are middle order players.Sehwag309 said:
Sudeep
International Captain
I was talking about Tests only.orangepitch said:I dont see why Yuvi and Flintoff are being eqauted.
Yuvraj is a better bat than Flintoff ( ok , theyre equal at best)
Flintoff is a better bowler than Yuvraj.. ( even if Yuvraj bowled regularly , you couldnt compare a medium pacer to a left arm spinner )
Yuvraj > Flintoff in fielding.
2 vastly different players.......why swap them ?
Realistically, Yuvraj should be replaced by either Chopra or Ramesh.
I picked Flintoff because of a couple of reasons:
- We won't be needed to watch Yuvraj open, because IMO it's going to fail, miserable.
- We can pick two spinners (Kumble, Harbhajan) on a regular basis, as Flintoff will fulfill the necessity of a third paceman.
- Flintoff is much more consistent ATM than Yuvraj, batting-wise. Sure, Yuvy hasn't played as many Tests to judge him, but that arguement for me weighs less against the one that Flintoff could provide a more all-round support to the Indian team.
Writing the above though was really really bizarre, something that would never take place even in dreams.
PY
International Coach
Not at second slip he isn't which is where Flintoff would field.orangepitch said:
IMHO, Flintoff has gone a long way to proving he is one of the top slippers (not footwear before the comedians see this) in the world.
To say that Yuvraj is better than Freddie with the bat is a tad strange to me as well. But each to their own.
biased indian
International Coach
For both ODI and Tests
Nehra with Pollock
Balaji with Gillespie
patel with Boucher
if its gilchrist it will create lot of problem in ODI with 4 players fighting for opening spot
Nehra with Pollock
Balaji with Gillespie
patel with Boucher
if its gilchrist it will create lot of problem in ODI with 4 players fighting for opening spot
Mr Mxyzptlk
Request Your Custom Title Now!
But if it's Boucher, it creates problems with solving mathematical equations...koch_cha said:if its gilchrist it will create lot of problem in ODI with 4 players fighting for opening spot
tooextracool
International Coach
would you rather have an all rounder or just a batsman?Sehwag309 said: