Walsh says Murali victimised because of success.

[nookie_lk]

aaahahahahhahahha very well said


haha nookie mate, you are the most bias and hypocritical guy going round, we all have our opinions and you just always think youre right... i think he's a chucker.... but one thing that isnt an opinion is that ranatunga needs to shed a few kg's

Look whos talking...
You go ahead and keep on thinkin that hes a chucker....but dont come to this forum and try to be a smart ass...thats it...
Oh by the way why are u so worried about ranatunga's size ? are u gay or something ?

 

[benchmark00]

Look whos talking...
You go ahead and keep on thinkin that hes a chucker....but dont come to this forum and try to be a smart ass...thats it...
Oh by the way why are u so worried about ranatunga's size ? are u gay or something ?

haha how does that suggest im gay? im just saying he's a disgrace to the game.... and he needs to shut his 'big' mouth in the media these days...

im allowed to express my oppinion, freedo of speech, just like youre allowed to express yours, dont get fired up over stuff that someone suggests

 

[nookie_lk]

haha how does that suggest im gay? im just saying he's a disgrace to the game.... and he needs to shut his 'big' mouth in the media these days...

im allowed to express my oppinion, freedo of speech, just like youre allowed to express yours, dont get fired up over stuff that someone suggests

Ok then u shoud have made that comment before instead of dissapointingly saying that arjuna is too fat and stuff... (that sounds very gay for me)
and dude i aint fired up for some silly @ss cheap autralian cr@p....

 

[C_C]

haha i have two words for sri lankan fans and murali in particularNO BALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


murali has yet to bowl a legitimate over in cricket!!!

NO BALL
NO BALL

hahahaha

Well i can say THE SAME THING ABOUT McGRATH.
Yet to bowl A LEGITIMATE OVER IN CRICKET

No ball
No ball

Pidge the chucker.Pidge the chucker.

haha isnt it funny how many hypocrites there are here... and its quite ammusing hearing sri lankan (and sub continent) fans sticking up from him, haha and im bias? i think lee has a bit of a suspect action too....

ofcourse you are. For you arnt criticising the ones proven to chuck from your home camp- McGrath, Gillespie, Kaspa etc etc etc.

I dont see what being Australian has to do with it. Im looking at it from an objective point of view. Being objective also leads me to think there is something suspect about Brett Lee as well.

being objective is to admit that almost ALL bowlers in cricket today in past were chuckers by the letter of the law.
That includes lillee,marshall,murali,kumble,kapil,wasim,imran,McGrath,Warne etc etc etc.
For research backs up that fact.

haha how does that suggest im gay? im just saying he's a disgrace to the game.... and he needs to shut his 'big' mouth in the media these days...

im allowed to express my oppinion, freedo of speech, just like youre allowed to express yours, dont get fired up over stuff that someone suggests

yea. we arnt muzzling you for saying your opinion. We are merely saying that your OPINION is flawed and biassed.

science can prove that a person with no arms chucks these days, it means nothing....

you obviously dont know much about science or you wouldnt be making that claim. Well you seem a bit ****ed that your make-believe world does not stand up to the scrutiny of FACTS- that is something science is based on.

And without facts, there is nothing to seperate the BS that you are spewing about Murali and the FACTUALLY BACKED UP COMMENTS *I* am making about all bowlers.

I think next time McGrath/Pollock/Kumble/Gillepsie etc. tours they should be greeted with chucker taunts.

 

[Arrow]

Walsh is 100% correct. Noone likes to see cheaters prosper.

 

[Craig]

Is this thread actually going anywhere?

 

[benchmark00]

haha brand mcgrath etc as a chucker, but the world will have their own opinion, if aussies chucked i would call them a chucker, no doubt about it... i think lee has a bit of a dodgy action, HEAR THAT!!!!!!!!!!

how come murali is the only spinner to be very widely branded as a chucker? because he's the only one, thus making him have an advantage... if everyone in fast bowling circles chuck or whatever you reckon, then noone has an advantage, all is equal..

get over yourself man, you have the biggest arrogant tone... an opinion cant be wrong...

 

[C_C]

haha brand mcgrath etc as a chucker, but the world will have their own opinion, if aussies chucked i would call them a chucker, no doubt about it... i think lee has a bit of a dodgy action, HEAR THAT!!!!!!!!!!

Scientific testing PROOVES that McGrath chucks.
That aint good enough for you i guess.
I guess you will go based on propaganda and victimisation.
Just a question- why do you believe then that the earth is round <if you do that is>
??

get over yourself man, you have the biggest arrogant tone... an opinion cant be wrong...

Okay. So you are telling me if somoene said 'in my opinion, aussies arnt human beings...they are lower than that"

how come murali is the only spinner to be very widely branded as a chucker? because he's the only one, thus making him have an advantage... if everyone in fast bowling circles chuck or whatever you reckon, then noone has an advantage, all is equal..

can you read ?
the only reason murali has been branded a chucker is because he has an unconventional action and a permanent kink in his arms. However, he does not FLEX any more than other bowlers do- that is backed up by analysis and data gathering by EXPERTS.
and the ICC report was that 99% bowlers in ICC champions trophy chucked.
Murali was not the only spinner involved. Thus by LOGIC, there are other spinners guilty of chucking.

 

[benchmark00]

the only reason murali has been branded a chucker is because he has an unconventional action and a permanent kink in his arms. However, he does not FLEX any more than other bowlers do- that is backed up by analysis and data gathering by EXPERTS.
and the ICC report was that 99% bowlers in ICC champions trophy chucked.
Murali was not the only spinner involved. Thus by LOGIC, there are other spinners guilty of chucking.

if you read my ORIGINAL post i said that murali has no choice but chuck!!!!! he is a victim of a poor genetic make up, i.e. his arm has a permanent kink...
Im not saying kick him out of the game, that would be just descrimination, im saying that he throws, not his fault though..... so based soley on his kink he has an advantage. unfortunate but thats the truth

 

[C_C]

so based soley on his kink he has an advantage. unfortunate but thats the truth

how can he have an advantage if 99% bowlers also chuck ?

The truth is, McGrath,Gillespie,Pollock,Ntini,Akhtar,Kumble,Harbhajan,Pathan,Sami,Collymore,Harmison,Giles,Flintoff etc etc. are just as much of a chucker as Murali is.

 

[Slow Love™]

the only reason murali has been branded a chucker is because he has an unconventional action and a permanent kink in his arms. However, he does not FLEX any more than other bowlers do- that is backed up by analysis and data gathering by EXPERTS.
and the ICC report was that 99% bowlers in ICC champions trophy chucked.
Murali was not the only spinner involved. Thus by LOGIC, there are other spinners guilty of chucking.

I'm sorry sir, this thread is for morons only, and I don't believe you have a pass.

 

[benchmark00]

how can he have an advantage if 99% bowlers also chuck ?

ugh dude ok... he gains advantage because he has a kink in his arm ALONG with the normal flex or whatever... you have to agree that by your reasoning without the kink he would throw, im saying he has the kink on top of this

im not blaming murali, and if this doesnt clear things up i really do give up because its wasting my time

 

[benchmark00]

I'm sorry sir, this thread is for morons only, and I don't believe you have a pass.

change your avatar, youre making me sick

 

[C_C]

change your avatar, youre making me sick

whats wrong with his avatar ?

ugh dude ok... he gains advantage because he has a kink in his arm ALONG with the normal flex or whatever... you have to agree that by your reasoning without the kink he would throw, im saying he has the kink on top of this

I would like to see ANY solid reasoning and proof on how his natural elbow flexion helps him.
And the LAWS are if you FLEX your elbow-ie, bend or straighten them. Not having a flex in the elbow.
You can bowl with an elbow joint bent at 90 degrees perfectly legally if you dont CHANGE that angle.

I'm sorry sir, this thread is for morons only, and I don't believe you have a pass.

seems evident.
Apparently these anti-murali bunch will go against FACTS just to keep their little make-believe world spinning.

 

[benchmark00]

whats wrong with his avatar ?

the guy looks like a poof

oh and you have proof that it wouldnt let him have an advantage... ok im over this no more...

 

[C_C]

the guy looks like a poof

oh and you have proof that it wouldnt let him have an advantage... ok im over this no more...

some might say that your avatar is uglier than his.....
I dont need to have proof for i am not the one making the allegations.
If you bring an allegation on the table-back it up.
There is NOTHING to say that he gains by having a permanent bend in his arms.
And if you tihnk there is something, substantiate it.
the burden of proof lies with the accuser and one who challenges the established evidences so far. Not other way round.
A year ago, if somone said McGrath is a chucker, the burden of proof would lie with him/her. For there was no evidence back then.
Same case here.

 

[Slow Love™]

the guy looks like a poof

LOL. Oh, man.... So, you're saying that poofs make you sick, then?

 

[Dasa]

It seems we have more than our usual share of idiots around these days. At least they're not Indian/Pakistani this time...

 

[benchmark00]

LOL. Oh, man.... So, you're saying that poofs make you sick, then?

id have to say most of the time they do......

lol and i had a big laugh when i saw what c_c wrote... lol good to see you say that you are more attracted to a man than carmen electra,lol

on the mcgrath thing... no comment. im over it... move on....

 

[Craig]

Can somebody please close this.