http://www.sundaytimes.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,7034,11731996%5E2762,00.html
Interesting read that.
Interesting read that.
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Walsh says Murali victimised because of success.
- Thread starter DT8
- Start date
- Status
age_master
Hall of Fame Member
murali isn't victimised because of success, its because hes a chucker
perfect way to put it 
Langeveldt
Soutie
Lol, took the words right out of my mouthage_master said:
Langeveldt
Soutie
Depends where you are.. Id say its a 75% skew in the other wayGoT_SpIn said:
Mr Mxyzptlk
Request Your Custom Title Now!
All in favour of a "Murali topics" thread, say aye. Walsh is the new Bradman. 
Langeveldt
Soutie
Why is it bias?marc71178 said:
benchmark00
Request Your Custom Title Now!
well i thought i'd put my two cents in 
... i think that murali is a victim of a poor genetic make up,lol... its true that he does have a dodgy action but its only because he cant straighten his arm (apparently, i cant say i've ever fondled his elbow) i think that he does throw, but ofcourse not deliberately and i think that if he does have a legal action he is a better spinner then warney and statistics will show, he is very very dangerous and always looks like getting a wicket (unlike warne who is more defensive).... its true however that warne has done more for spin bowling then what murali has..
I THINK HE'S A CHUCKER!
... i think that murali is a victim of a poor genetic make up,lol... its true that he does have a dodgy action but its only because he cant straighten his arm (apparently, i cant say i've ever fondled his elbow) i think that he does throw, but ofcourse not deliberately and i think that if he does have a legal action he is a better spinner then warney and statistics will show, he is very very dangerous and always looks like getting a wicket (unlike warne who is more defensive).... its true however that warne has done more for spin bowling then what murali has..I THINK HE'S A CHUCKER!
C_C
International Captain
do you understand the concept of bias ?
Bias is to either show favouritism/mistreatment towards one out a buncha people who are in the same boat/guilty of same thing.
Your propensity of calling Murali a chucker while not labelling McGrath,Gillespie,Pollock,Ntini,Kumble,etc. when ICC have concluded,based on scientific analysis, that Sarwan apart, all bowlers who took part in the ICC championship trophy chucked clearly shows bias AGAINST murali.
Why single out someone when everyone is guilty of the same crime ?
THAT, my friend, is called selectiveness and bias.
Langeveldt
Soutie
He wouldnt need to be attacked if he was rubbish... Its the fact he has made a successful career, and a mockery of many batsmen, effectively through cheating..duffer said:Well if he was sh1te no-one would bother victimising him
C_C
International Captain
same applies for McGrath, Pollock,Gillespie,Ntini, Kumble, Pathan,Vaas,Harmison,Flintoff etc etc etc.
So which begs the question- why are you singling out Murali ?
This is like having a nation of criminals but you prosecute only one.
clear bias and unfairness.
I suppose you wont mind if you are a soldier in a war and i pick on YOU and ONLY YOU for war crimes.
- Status