Virat Kohli's prime vs Sachin Tendulkar's prime

[Narayana]

McGrath wasn’t good in the 1990s? Lol

No,in comparison to Donald, Wasim, Ambrose

 

[DrWolverine]

1990s

 

[Narayana]

1990s
View attachment 44687

Thanks for proving my point, Waugh performed way better in away against better bowlers than McGrath (90#/s)

 

[DrWolverine]

Donald & Ambrose were slightly better
I would say he was equal to Akram

 

[Coronis]

So what West Indies bowlers, Pak bowlers are better than aus Bowers.

I beg to differ.

 

[sayon basak]

I beg to differ.

View attachment 44689

That's a beautiful penguin. Is it you pet?

 

[Coronis]

That's a beautiful penguin. Is it you pet?

Unsure if serious tbh. Which scares me

 

[Narayana]

I beg to differ.

View attachment 44689

On what basis do you think aus bowlers are better? Stats says otherwise

 

[sayon basak]

Unsure if serious tbh. Which scares me

I'm serious (and scary).

 

[Spark]

On what basis do you think aus bowlers are better? Stats says otherwise

Saying a 1 run difference in average proves anything, devoid of all context, is singular abuse of stats.

 

[OverratedSanity]

On what basis do you think aus bowlers are better? Stats says otherwise

Do you think Courtney Walsh or Shaun Pollock were bettter than Shane Warne

 

[Coronis]

On what basis do you think aus bowlers are better? Stats says otherwise

Did you not read the text and image?

 

[Narayana]

Do you think Courtney Walsh or Shaun Pollock were bettter than Shane Warne

Do you think McDermott better than Pollock, Walsh?

Bowling records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPNcricinfo.com

stats.espncricinfo.com

 

[Narayana]

Saying a 1 run difference in average proves anything, devoid of all context, is singular abuse of stats.

90s is not about only McGrath lol, what about McDermott, May?

 

[Spark]

90s is not about only McGrath lol, what about McDermott, May?

I'm sure you'll come out and say conceding 0.32 runs a wicket more or less means a bowler is definitely better or worse regardless.

 

[Johan]

Only took 260 wickets @22.7. What a loser.

was also only bad for like first 2 years when he was finding himself, 1995-1999 he had 247 @ 21.28, 48.7 SR and 15 5fers, what a nobody

 

[govinda indian fan]

Between 1993-2002
Batsmen with 5000+ test runs
Sachin was simply ahead of everyone else then
View attachment 44684

Wow sachin greatest after sir don Bradman

 

[govinda indian fan]

Kohli prime is good but sachin just better

 

[Narayana]

Wow sachin greatest after sir don Bradman

Can't say when Steve Smith and sobers exist.
They all 3 belongs to same tier.

 

[govinda indian fan]

Can't say when Steve Smith and sobers exist.
They all 3 belongs to same tier.

sobers is greatest cricketer and smith is true atg but sachin averaged 58 in 90s which was bowling friendly. I doubt smith averages 50 plus since bowling era started in 2018