Patience and Accuracy+Gut
State Vice-Captain
De Villiers imho was the best ODI batsman ever. Changed ODI in a way with those insane shot making.
Viv is really in a league of his own in this format IMO.De Villiers imho was the best ODI batsman ever. Changed ODI in a way with those insane shot making.
I think he's the best, but I don't think hes in a league of his own. There are good arguments to be made for Tendulkar, Kohli, De Villiers. Bradman is in a league of his own.Viv is really in a league of his own in this format IMO.
Bradman played ODIs?I think he's the best, but I don't think hes in a league of his own. There are good arguments to be made for Tendulkar, Kohli, De Villiers. Bradman is in a league of his own.
I am just saying that his (in tests) is the differential needed to be in a league of ones ownBradman played ODIs?
Oh, cool. I was wondering how Bradman's name came up in an ODI GOAT thread. You are right though.I am just saying that his (in tests) is the differential needed to be in a league of ones own
As a whole package, given he was more than a part time spinner and the best fielder of his generation.Viv is really in a league of his own in this format IMO.
Kohli and Rohit scored less than 25 runs in first 10 overs when the target was 340. ( vs England, last WC)Plus despite Sachin’s SR being better, it’s never given him a benefit Kohli doesn’t have(look at how many times Kohli’s been involved in big improbable run chases).
You are just citing one rare chase Kohli didn’t master. There are so many others he did. This is just pure speculation.Kohli and Rohit scored less than 25 runs in first 10 overs when the target was 340. ( vs England, last WC)
Sachin scored faster, because he was the only one capable to do that in 90s team.
Kohli instead of Sachin in 90s Indian team would have reduced India to a New Zealand of 90s.
What. That is terrible logic. Strike rate isn't only about run chases.Plus despite Sachin’s SR being better, it’s never given him a benefit Kohli doesn’t have(look at how many times Kohli’s been involved in big improbable run chases).
No I’m just giving an example to show how Kohli’s SR has never disadvantaged India, and despite having a lower SR/lower era adjusted SR than other ATG’s, he has accomplished more crazy run chases than them. And sure Sachin’s SR in hindsight could have accorded Ind advantages that Kohli’s SR can’t, but it is ludicrous to believe that the gaps in Sachin and Kohli’s century conversion ratios or their chasing abilities could be bridged through era adjustment. There’s too much of a gap there.What. That is terrible logic. Strike rate isn't only about run chases.
Viv has 11 hundreds in 167 innings. I'd assume its considerably poor compared to other top tier guys (didn't check)I think Richards is honestly the best.
Sachin, Virat and AB are in that tier too. I would probably go in that order. Also gotta account for Virat still playing.
I mean it's easier to score 100s when average score is 300 than when it's 200Viv has 11 hundreds in 167 innings. I'd assume its considerably poor compared to other top tier guys (didn't check)
Different era obvs but he did bat top of the order
Era adjusted it's similar to Sachin but not as good as Kohli.Viv has 11 hundreds in 167 innings. I'd assume its considerably poor compared to other top tier guys (didn't check)
Different era obvs but he did bat top of the order