• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Unofficial* New Zealand Black Caps Thread

Howsie

International Captain
I don’t think most of you lot realise how money is actually made and split amongst most sporting organisations/leagues ?
 

jcas0167

International Regular
Lifted from the NZ Cricket fan forum, "up and coming" pace bowlers in NZ:

"Ben Sears, Nathan Smith, Simon Keene, Joey Field, Jacob Duffy, Kristian Clarke, Michael Rae, Will O'Rourke, Henry Shipley, Zak Foulkes, Josh Clarkson, Brett Randell, Blair Tickner, Matt Fisher, Zak Gibson, Jarrod McKay

The only lefties on the domestic scene are Ben Lister, Ed Nuttall and Andrew Hazeldine."
 
Last edited:

SteveNZ

Cricketer Of The Year
I don’t think most of you lot realise how money is actually made and split amongst most sporting organisations/leagues ?
That hasn't immeasurably changed in the time Trent has been an NZ cricketer. And he's a very intelligent guy, he'd know the financial workings of NZC. It makes no sense to me that there is anything happening now in terms of revenue share split that would drive him out of the game, because (my opinion, and based on what he's said in the media) it's all to do with his family and being able to pick and choose where he plays.

Anyway, you think there'll be an influx of guys leaving...let's see.
 

thundaboult

International Debutant
Lifted from the NZ Cricket fan forum, "up and coming" pace bowlers in NZ:

"Ben Sears, Nathan Smith, Simon Keene, Joey Field, Jacob Duffy, Kristian Clarke, Michael Rae, Will O'Rourke, Henry Shipley, Zak Foulkes, Josh Clarkson, Brett Randell, Blair Tickner, Matt Fisher, Zak Gibson, Jarrod McKay

The only lefties on the domestic scene are Ben Lister, Ed Nuttall and Andrew Hazeldine."
Depressing.
 

Immenso

International Vice-Captain
Can it not simultaneously be true that NZC doesn't have as much money as overseas T20 leagues, that anyone who rage quits because women are getting money can GTFO, but that our contract offers to top male players might in some cases be sub-optimal (on in future turn out to be sub-optimal) because of debatable allocation of funds that is at least worthy of discussion?

Yes I realise this is an entirely hypothetical and pointless "both sides are fine people" centrist dickhead post.
Yeah. The amounts we are talking - Women's contracts impact any future liklihood of Plunket Shield reverting back to 10 rounds on the near horizon. Until it gets to the point of being cost neutral or profitable (or NZC get boosted income from elsewhere, e.g. ICC TV cycles)

Doesn't really impact top blackcaps contracts.

Boult's is a life stage choice, not a financial choice, IMO.
 

Immenso

International Vice-Captain
Interestingly will they give the contract back to Jimmy or will they pick another 30+ or near 30 year old player to give the contract to. If NZC is serious they should look at getting Sears, Allen or Ravindra into the contract list. These guys have lots of years to offer. I think they will give it to yet another oldish bloke that will likely last for one or two years in the international circuit max.
If you give it too a young bloke, then they'll just get rich early, get burnt-out early, retire early. Like Boult.

Anyway, these are rolling 1 year contracts, not talking a 5 year deal to lock in an exciting young talent to Manchester Utd etc.

It absolutely should go to the next most deserving talent for the playing mix they need, probably Neesh. To give an option to someone on a near-Boult like situation (minus the young family, possibly)

Giving it to Sears, Allen or Ravindra would probably make absolutely no difference. Actually, I say that but Allen with T20s and Sears with Law have other high earning options. Ravindra is more a 'prisoner' of having to do the hard yards. So whether he earns 80k or 150k will make no difference to what he does over the next 2 years. How much cricket he plays. Considering there is a higher earning contract not far away anyway without needing to 'favour youth'.

But honestly, who would chose Law 8 to 10 years earlier than required? 4 years of University would knock the naivity out that checking property contracts isn't actually as exciting as those episode of 'Suits' made it out to be.
 
Last edited:

Flem274*

123/5
Yeah. The amounts we are talking - Women's contracts impact any future liklihood of Plunket Shield reverting back to 10 rounds on the near horizon. Until it gets to the point of being cost neutral or profitable (or NZC get boosted income from elsewhere, e.g. ICC TV cycles)
Let's not pretend this was ever going to happen, or that the primary reason was "cost saving".

NZC's goal is profit maxing, and that means NZ being a specialist T20 side with token efforts in ODIs and tests.
 

Immenso

International Vice-Captain
Let's not pretend this was ever going to happen, or that the primary reason was "cost saving".

NZC's goal is profit maxing, and that means NZ being a specialist T20 side with token efforts in ODIs and tests.
I'm going to pretend it was going to happen. Otherwise can never hold them to account when they don't do it.

It was sold as a temporary change, to fund A tours, but there was a 'hockey graph' shaped ICC scheduled payments in the 8 year deal meaning bigger money was supposed to be happening now to allow both cake and eating (But covid, presumably ...). But also, don't mention it and maybe they will forget.
 

straw man

Hall of Fame Member
Love Boult, the England tour was an impressive return to test cricket form and he's one of our best two limited overs bowlers, so this is a huge blow.

I don't agree that it's beyond the pale to criticise the decision in Boult's case though, if it does indeed mean to give up playing for NZ in order to play more overseas T20 comps.
I would completely understand if someone with three kids wants to stop touring the world for months at a time, and so retires from cricket.
Or if you're just over touring or have lost the desire full stop, would be understandable to retire.
Also completely understand that sportspeople have a limited career-span before they get old or injured, and sometimes struggle for earnings post-cricket, so need to set themselves and their family up while the going's good. So I would never quibble with a late-career non-core NZ player like Colin Munro, who wouldn't have high career earnings to that point, going off to the T20 comps to try maximise those earnings while he can.

But Boult is a core player who has been on one of the top NZ contracts for years and has been playing in the extremely lucrative IPL for several seasons - his career earnings must be around the NZ$5M mark to date, so his family have to be pretty well set up unless he spent it all on dogecoin. No, it's not up to randos on the internet to decide how much money is enough for a person, but if he's looking at being away from family overseas to play for NZ, vs being away from family overseas to earn more money in domestic comps, and choosing the latter, I do still find that disappointing.

Fundamentally I'm just a greedy cricket fan that wants to see the best NZ players keep playing, win the T20/ODI world cup and win test matches. Boult is one of our best.
 
Last edited:

Chubb

International Regular
Men in their mid-thirties behaving like high schoolers. Good to get some names for the rumoured Mean Girls clique. Bit of a shame since I was a big fan of both players named.
It seems to happen in every sports team, even very successful ones. Hard to think of a single team that didn't have cliques.
 

Top