slugger
State Vice-Captain
a comedian or two always pops up in these types of threads ^^^^... change happens in small increment's .. 20/20 should have been reduced to 25/25 .. but it probably came down to marketing in the end .. if the crowds continue to drop off in the 50 over version .. over time you will see less and less of that version... a 2 inn version of the (ODI or the 20/20) game is something that should be considered. but its not going to be tried unless there are some real encourage signs from the market (us)...the question is how do you guage this change.. probably the same way the ecb went to the crowd and understood that there just wasnt enough time in the day to watch a game for 8 hours... thus the game was remodeled to compete with other sports and people time crisis..
so the question is if you have gone to the exttreme 20/20 (3 hours) can you now increse when the markets have asked for less and got less... a 20/20 x2 is going to increse to a 6 hour lenght match ..i think they should make games to match one another that way everything looks like a progess not a hodge podge of formats.. I would have 20/20 1 inn each. 40/40 2 inn each of 20 overs.. then 4 day cricket 2 inn each (i believe the introduction of tech would contribute to many games finishing inside 4 days). anyhow..
so the question is if you have gone to the exttreme 20/20 (3 hours) can you now increse when the markets have asked for less and got less... a 20/20 x2 is going to increse to a 6 hour lenght match ..i think they should make games to match one another that way everything looks like a progess not a hodge podge of formats.. I would have 20/20 1 inn each. 40/40 2 inn each of 20 overs.. then 4 day cricket 2 inn each (i believe the introduction of tech would contribute to many games finishing inside 4 days). anyhow..