Okay, so perhaps your comments were slightly exaggerated. Surely you know the means....:rolleyes:Choora said:LOL! what a deperate attempt but all in waste!
If an inclusion of a couple of players make a team the best it doesn't mean that the player happen to be the best ever in the history of game.
Slightly:rolleyes:Mr Mxyzptlk said:Okay, so perhaps your comments were slightly exaggerated. Surely you know the means....:rolleyes:
When you look at how far behind Australia the India team without those 2 were (and indeed are) - that implies these 2 are greats.Choora said:LOL! what a deperate attempt but all in waste!
If an inclusion of a couple of players make a team the best it doesn't mean that the player happen to be the best ever in the history of game.
No, we all knew he was crap from the word go...marc71178 said:Now, has anyone come close to putting anything like that about Harmison, I don't think so!
What a shame then that he's proving you wrong and is England's highest ranked bowler used this summer (even above Anderson)Rik said:No, we all knew he was crap from the word go...
thats not saying much though is it?marc71178 said:What a shame then that he's proving you wrong and is England's highest ranked bowler used this summer (even above Anderson)
It would be nice if he was actually proving me wrong. I'm afraid 18 wickets in 6 Tests at 31 does not constitute proving me wrong. In fact they back me up, almost damningly when you remember 9 of them were taken in 2 Tests against a hapless Zimbabwe batting lineup.marc71178 said:What a shame then that he's proving you wrong and is England's highest ranked bowler used this summer (even above Anderson)
It usually happens when someone is given a free ride when he didn't give any reason for him to be selected in the 1st place...marc71178 said:Considering the people writing him off so often, it is, yes.
Still remains the worst inconsistent cricketer in cricket history who still gets the odd callup for his country.. Why arent ppl like neil given a chance then?:PAB Agarkar 10-0-64-0 (6w)
AB Agarkar lbw b Kumble 1 (8m, 10b)
marc71178 said:When you look at how far behind Australia the India team without those 2 were (and indeed are) - that implies these 2 are greats.
SRT is, but Balaji isn't (by a long chalk)
That is utter nonsense because Harbhajan would not have had anywhere near that kind of success had the series been contested in Australia. Therefore I suggest you find a new example if you wish to disprove his logic.Choora said:Harbhajan Singh played a crucial role in India's famous test victory over Australia, if one go by ur logic then Harbhajan Singh should be the best ever spinner in the history of the game !(though in reality he isn't even the best current offspinner )
You were saying add just 2 players (SRT and Balaji) to the side of the time and they would be the best side in the World.Choora said:So now you drag in Australian team into it