Mr Mxyzptlk
Request Your Custom Title Now!
I always have been a big Shaun Pollock fan and defender, but when it comes to Pollock v Flintoff, I'd currently pick Flintoff to get me a wicket ahead of Pollock.
Cupboard's pretty bare on the real pace front. To stretch a point I guess you could include Ntini, but I think nowadays he's more brisk fast-med a la Dizzy.a massive zebra said:Oh please
Surely both are at least as good as Sami, if not Lee. Best for one has exhibited a lot of potential in One Day Internationals, let alone Tests. Edwards the same. Lee isn't a superstar either.BoyBrumby said:After that we're probably down to Tino & Fidel and, well sometimes it's kinder just say nothing at all, eh?
Sorry, that was a bit of a cheap shot!Mr Mxyzptlk said:Surely both are at least as good as Sami, if not Lee. Best for one has exhibited a lot of potential in One Day Internationals, let alone Tests. Edwards the same. Lee isn't a superstar either.
What, who's faster than Lee and Sami in Internation Cricket?a massive zebra said:Oh please
Harmison has 102 Test Wickets @ 24.73 including 4 five-fors.Sudeep said:Rummy. A top five pacemen list ignoring Glenn McGrath is utterly rubbish IMO.
Irfan Pathan definitely deserve to be in the top five as yet, based on his performances in one year. He has to repeat what he has done so far on a consitent and long term basis. The same might apply for Harmison, but he's in a different league as far as I see it. It's a very touchy subject, if Harmison gets in the top five, then why doesn't Pathan? I'd like to read some opinions on it, but I myself rate Harmison higher.
Voltman said:It's pretty much nothing but mile races in the US, right? Sokyola, Just An Excuse and Elsu would all give it a nudge over 2400 or more.
Anyway, we've gone off topic - naughty me...
'proven match winner'...discusswahindiawah said:Irfan might not have great stats, but he's a proven match winner and deserve to be in the top 5 list.
Lets not jump the gun here on Pathan. He's not even close to being there yet.wahindiawah said:Top 5 would be,
\Harmison
Flintoff
Gillespie
McGrath
Pathan
Pollock i believe is down the hill, while Shoaib is pretty much overrated.
Irfan might not have great stats, but he's a proven match winner and deserve to be in the top 5 list.
Smacking bias there. Tino has far better domestic stats, similar Test stats, less FC experience, a good ODI record thus far. Smacking bias.imranrabb said:Tino and Edwards the same as sami u must be joking.Sami has got more potential then these put together.
id like to see how many people rate zaheer khan as the best bowler in india let alone the world.masterblaster said:Absolutely, although he has a lot of talent and should get there if he puts his mind to it and works hard.
I dont think even Sourav Ganguly would rate Zaheer Khan as one of the best bowlers in the world.
couldn't agree moreLink said:I agree with most of the bowlers mentioned in the lists. But a list I would create would have to include Shane Bond. He's ruthless, pacey, he bowls in the right areas, he can move the ball both ways. And apart from being injury prone what more could you ask for in a bowler??
Except he hasn't played in international cricket in almost two years...bryce said:couldn't agree more