Is that a "not even God could sink this ship" comment?steds said:Why was Ping listed at 7, btw? Surely our tail isn't that long. (Not that we ever need anyone a #7 with Stedman and Markus )
I'd be careful there, steds, you dont want to bring down the Irony Gods down on your butt.steds said:Why was Ping listed at 7, btw? Surely our tail isn't that long. (Not that we ever need anyone a #7 with Stedman and Markus )
That will all depend on how the side shapes up and who's selected.new_age_ar said:Is there any chance i can play a similar role when Sean, Rob and Marc comeback, i.e bat at 7 and play the Wilshere/Hussey role.
I hope you're not implying that I can't bat!steds said:Why was Ping listed at 7, btw? Surely our tail isn't that long. (Not that we ever need anyone a #7 with Stedman and Markus )
I love how you put Gray as a One Day Wonder, yet didn't mention Feeney. OD games Feeney has played this season (up to the 25th of March): 9. Gray: 4. Feeney's scored alot more runs, too. (And it's not only because he's played more games)steds said:
lol thats quailtysteds said:
That's just cos the selectors are silly.Robertinho said:. OD games Feeney has played this season (up to the 25th of March): 9. Gray: 4.
When you're nominated for OD MVP, I'll accept that you're qualified to make that call.Robertinho said:Let's face it, if Gray is a one day wonder, then Beamer Smith is literate.
Why? My OD prowess is irrelevant...steds said:When you're nominated for OD MVP, I'll accept that you're qualified to make that call.
Not really, many commentators, analysts, etc. are terrible at cricket, yet offer better opinions than others who are good cricket players.cricketboy29 said:Maybe because of the fact that when you can excel at ODs then it is justifiable for you to actually comment on someone elses one day record.