isn't it a thing that deterioratesI also don't see why the fact that he has comparably better hand eye coordination now means he'll have worse hand eye coordination later
Easily forgotten.Depends which way you look at it. Based on current form yes, but AB has also achieved some miraculous feats; scoring runs everywhere against top class class bowlers. Easy to forget how good and highly regarded he was before the dip in the form.
When we look at the overall career, I doubt any current player is "much better" than AB.
Gob gonna get run off the board with blasphemy like thisSmitteh could go **** up when/if he starts to miss straight ones tbh
I don't for a second pretend to be an expert on the more technical side to batting. But he is surely a dead set lbw candidate cept for the fact the **** never misses?? If that ever does go then you would think he'd be in some trouble, but tbh I wouldn't be surprised if he just changed something and went on his merry way.I don't think there's any truth to this whatsoever. There's no reason to think he relies on hand eye coordination more than anyone else. This is a weird assumption that keeps getting perpetuated.
That's just because his head is still and his balance is perfect. Technique, not hand-eye.I don't for a second pretend to be an expert on the more technical side to batting. But he is surely a dead set lbw candidate cept for the fact the **** never misses?? If that ever does go then you would think he'd be in some trouble, but tbh I wouldn't be surprised if he just changed something and went on his merry way.
BTW, I hate him.
Tbf these things can degrade rapidly with age too.That's just because his head is still and his balance is perfect.
Every single player is a "dead set lbw candidate" (or bowled candidate) if they miss. That's why when the ball's on the stumps you try not to miss it. Smith being set up a bit further across than most when playing the ball doesn't change anything, because he's in a perfect position to play it. Hence why he "never misses".I don't for a second pretend to be an expert on the more technical side to batting. But he is surely a dead set lbw candidate cept for the fact the **** never misses?? If that ever does go then you would think he'd be in some trouble, but tbh I wouldn't be surprised if he just changed something and went on his merry way.
BTW, I hate him.
If you're playing across the line to stuff on off stump where batsmen usually play straight, your chances of lbw increase surely. He's just got great balance and never falls over.Every single player is a "dead set lbw candidate" (or bowled candidate) if they miss. That's why when the ball's on the stumps you try not to miss it. Smith being set up a bit further across than most when playing the ball doesn't change anything, because he's in a perfect position to play it. Hence why he "never misses".
Again, it's really weird that people perpetuate these theories that he's more vulnerable to certain things because of his different set up and footwork. He's not, if anything it's the opposite.
No because he is essentially playing straight in a perfect position. For other players it would definitely increase the chances of lbw if they just set up across the stumps, but not for him. This should be obvious due to how rarely he gets out lbw in that fashion.If you're playing across the line to stuff on off stump where batsmen usually play straight, your chances of lbw increase surely. He's just got great balance and never falls over.