• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

The 'real' Steven Smith question...

Based on this hypothetical, Should Smith be considered the 2nd Greatest Test bat?


  • Total voters
    20
  • Poll closed .

Spark

Global Moderator
I also don't see why the fact that he has comparably better hand eye coordination now means he'll have worse hand eye coordination later
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Doesn’t matter who you are, if you start kicking straight ones you’re ****ed
 

Adders

Cricketer Of The Year
I don't think there's any truth to this whatsoever. There's no reason to think he relies on hand eye coordination more than anyone else. This is a weird assumption that keeps getting perpetuated.
I don't for a second pretend to be an expert on the more technical side to batting. But he is surely a dead set lbw candidate cept for the fact the **** never misses?? If that ever does go then you would think he'd be in some trouble, but tbh I wouldn't be surprised if he just changed something and went on his merry way.

BTW, I hate him.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
I don't for a second pretend to be an expert on the more technical side to batting. But he is surely a dead set lbw candidate cept for the fact the **** never misses?? If that ever does go then you would think he'd be in some trouble, but tbh I wouldn't be surprised if he just changed something and went on his merry way.

BTW, I hate him.
That's just because his head is still and his balance is perfect. Technique, not hand-eye.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
That's just because his head is still and his balance is perfect.
Tbf these things can degrade rapidly with age too.

Not saying it'll necessarily happen to him but it's a possibility, and has happened to many a great batsman.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I don't for a second pretend to be an expert on the more technical side to batting. But he is surely a dead set lbw candidate cept for the fact the **** never misses?? If that ever does go then you would think he'd be in some trouble, but tbh I wouldn't be surprised if he just changed something and went on his merry way.

BTW, I hate him.
Every single player is a "dead set lbw candidate" (or bowled candidate) if they miss. That's why when the ball's on the stumps you try not to miss it. Smith being set up a bit further across than most when playing the ball doesn't change anything, because he's in a perfect position to play it. Hence why he "never misses".

Again, it's really weird that people perpetuate these theories that he's more vulnerable to certain things because of his different set up and footwork. He's not, if anything it's the opposite.
 

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
The reason he never misses balls on his pads is that he puts himself into a position where a ball on off stump is to him where a ball on leg stump is to a regular batsman. You know how most batsmen will feel they missed out if they don't smack a ball on the pads for 4? Well Smith gets bowlers to put more balls on his pads due to his technique.

Most batsmen get lbw when the ball passes under the eye line. To the leg side of the eye line is easier to track and gets put away much more easily. Smith makes sure that balls which would get him lbw are to the leg side of his eye line which he can then easily flick away. The balls under his eye line hit him outside the line.

The thing which is most amazing about Smith's technique is that he doesn't nick off more often. It's his judgement outside off that's incredible. He never seems cramped for room even though he pushes further across than most batsmen. His wagon wheel from the 200 in the last test showed a really nice set of scoring shots running right around the field (except dead straight). That is the sign of a batsman in total commands of their leg and off side play.
 

Furball

Evil Scotsman
Isn't Smith's movement across a more extreme version of what Katich used to do?

I don't remember Katich being a massive lbw candidate either.
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Every single player is a "dead set lbw candidate" (or bowled candidate) if they miss. That's why when the ball's on the stumps you try not to miss it. Smith being set up a bit further across than most when playing the ball doesn't change anything, because he's in a perfect position to play it. Hence why he "never misses".

Again, it's really weird that people perpetuate these theories that he's more vulnerable to certain things because of his different set up and footwork. He's not, if anything it's the opposite.
If you're playing across the line to stuff on off stump where batsmen usually play straight, your chances of lbw increase surely. He's just got great balance and never falls over.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
If you're playing across the line to stuff on off stump where batsmen usually play straight, your chances of lbw increase surely. He's just got great balance and never falls over.
No because he is essentially playing straight in a perfect position. For other players it would definitely increase the chances of lbw if they just set up across the stumps, but not for him. This should be obvious due to how rarely he gets out lbw in that fashion.

The theory that he's not getting out lbw because of some freakish hand-eye coordination despite his technique is just silly.
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I don't understand what you mean by essentially playing straight in a perfect position
 

Top