• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

The greatest-ever left-arm finger-spinner

Who was the greatest-ever left-arm finger-spinner


  • Total voters
    58

neville cardus

International Debutant
Interestingly, in 1882, Peate was rated ahead of even Spofforth in some circles (among them the much-lauded Charles Pardon of Bell's Life).
 

SJS

Hall of Fame Member
Speaking of Wardle, has anyone else noticed the uncanny similarity between his action and that of Blythe?
The basic similarity is in that both of them start with the hand with the ball starting from far behind the back as they are looking over the right shoulder.

Blythe's action looks more smooth with the body more erect and yet the bowling arm slightly away from the perpendicular. Wardle's action, on the other hand, looks slightly more energetic with the body leaning to a bit to the right but the bowling arm very erect.

I also noticed in another picture how Wardle's right toe was pointing towards fine leg - not exactly classical
 

Attachments

Last edited:

neville cardus

International Debutant
The basic similarity is in that both of them start with the hand with the ball starting from far behind the back as they are looking over the right shoulder.
That was the decisive factor in my observation. It is a highly idiosyncratic little oddity, and it struck as strange that two such prominent bowlers as Blythe and Wardle should have shared it and yet never, to the best of my knowledge, had the similarity remarked upon.

Blythe's action looks more smooth with the body more erect and yet the bowling arm slightly away from the perpendicular. Wardle's action, on the other hand, looks slightly more energetic with the body leaning to a bit to the right but the bowling arm very erect.
Blythe was obviously a treat to watch, one of that rare strain of movingly elegant practitioners to whom the repulsive term "bowler" does zero justice. I would have paid a large portion of my limited funds to have seen him in action.

Wardle was more utility, craft and efficacy than graceful panache. His was a rough and ready approach, wholly befitting his personality -- much as Blythe's soft symmetry suited his.

The same, indeed, might be said of Wilfred Rhodes, who was even less an aesthetic turn-on than Johnny. The quintessential Yorkshire pro, Rhodes simply got on with the job at hand and bothered with nowt else. His run-up was almost non-existent -- two steps at most, then a small, childlike hop --, and the arm's hurried whipping-over left nothing to Cardusesque flights of romantic fancy.

They really are a fascinating breed, these slow left-armers.
 
Last edited:

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
I've taken four stills of Blythe and compared them to four frames from newsreel footage of Wardle. It's hardly ideal, but it should give some idea.
Fascinating (even if the Wardle frames are a bit blurry). And even more so given I've never seen Wardle in colour before now.
 

neville cardus

International Debutant
Fascinating
Isn't it just?

(even if the Wardle frames are a bit blurry).
That, alas, is the best that PowerDVD could do for me.

And even more so given I've never seen Wardle in colour before now.
There's a surprising wealth of colour footage from the 1950s. Those particular frames come from '55.

I've been trying to get some idea of how each of the slow left-armers bowled. Lord Hawke (of all people) describes Ted Peate's action as "the most perfect", but Yorkshire 'keeper David Hunter leaves it at "beautiful".

R. H. Lyttelton reckons that "his bowling arm never raised above his shoulder" -- and Allan Steel confirms it, telling us that he bowled round-arm. Steel goes on to record that he "did not toss the ball at all high in the air [....] He was an exceptional good length, difficult to see, and had a lot of work on. Some of his performances against the Australians are truly wonderful. When Peate first began to play cricket he was a very fast, high-actioned bowler, and the writer remembers finding him on the slow sticky wicket of the Carlisle ground very nasty to play. He subsequently altered his pace to slow, and it is a remarkable fact that after this alteration he completely lost the power of sending down a really fast ball."

I'll bring forth my findings on Peel at a later stage.
 
Last edited:

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Caused too much backache?

A surfeit of cricket bad for Umpires as well as players?

I always knew there were less errors back in t' day!






(Note: this last line isn't entirely ironic. While we can never know for certain how many Umpiring errors there were before cricket got proper coverage - probably around the start of the Nine era - it does seem conceivable to me that there were indeed fewer errors in halycon days)
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Johnny Wardle. :unsure:

Given that the competition involves such luminaries as David Sincock and Paul Adams... it's really a question that has no right to be asked.

"Least awful left-arm wristspinner" would be a more appropriate question.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Here is another umpire "bending his back" to get it right.

Who can tell who this famous umpire is ?
If you told me the year, I might be able to guess.

About the only Umpire who ever comes to mind when "old" (ie, pre-1970s) fellaz are concerned is Frank Chester.
 

Top