neville cardus
International Debutant
Echoed. Let's have some more!Always loved that one.
Echoed. Let's have some more!Always loved that one.
Never seen the latter, and have only seen one or two clips of the former TBH.Speaking of Wardle, has anyone else noticed the uncanny similarity between his action and that of Blythe?
I've taken four stills of Blythe and compared them to four frames from newsreel footage of Wardle. It's hardly ideal, but it should give some idea.Never seen the latter, and have only seen one or two clips of the former TBH.
The basic similarity is in that both of them start with the hand with the ball starting from far behind the back as they are looking over the right shoulder.Speaking of Wardle, has anyone else noticed the uncanny similarity between his action and that of Blythe?
Because he's obviously a better bowler than anyone on that list except Underwood, Verity and Rhodes. The people have spoken.Any reason why Daniel Vettori has so many votes? Currently he has about nine too many.
That was the decisive factor in my observation. It is a highly idiosyncratic little oddity, and it struck as strange that two such prominent bowlers as Blythe and Wardle should have shared it and yet never, to the best of my knowledge, had the similarity remarked upon.The basic similarity is in that both of them start with the hand with the ball starting from far behind the back as they are looking over the right shoulder.
Blythe was obviously a treat to watch, one of that rare strain of movingly elegant practitioners to whom the repulsive term "bowler" does zero justice. I would have paid a large portion of my limited funds to have seen him in action.Blythe's action looks more smooth with the body more erect and yet the bowling arm slightly away from the perpendicular. Wardle's action, on the other hand, looks slightly more energetic with the body leaning to a bit to the right but the bowling arm very erect.
Fascinating (even if the Wardle frames are a bit blurry). And even more so given I've never seen Wardle in colour before now.I've taken four stills of Blythe and compared them to four frames from newsreel footage of Wardle. It's hardly ideal, but it should give some idea.
Isn't it just?Fascinating
That, alas, is the best that PowerDVD could do for me.(even if the Wardle frames are a bit blurry).
There's a surprising wealth of colour footage from the 1950s. Those particular frames come from '55.And even more so given I've never seen Wardle in colour before now.
That umpire is a gun though. No better way to judge lbws than to get as low to the stumps as possible.I also noticed in another picture how Wardle's right toe was pointing towards fine leg - not exactly classical
Why do they not do that anymore?That umpire is a gun though. No better way to judge lbws than to get as low to the stumps as possible.
Gives me an idea actually...There's a surprising wealth of colour footage from the 1950s. Those particular frames come from '55.
Here is another umpire "bending his back" to get it right.Why do they not do that anymore?
If you told me the year, I might be able to guess.Here is another umpire "bending his back" to get it right.
Who can tell who this famous umpire is ?