• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

The Battle of the Englishmen

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Tomm's vote is the clincher. Lord Ted ousts The Hammer of The Crims 9-8; a nation mourns. :-O :p

Next up a clash that crictics of this thread's exciting, free-flowing, end-to-end, cup-tie format really aren't going to like at all. Fate saved the best for last, IMHO. The openers in England's celestial XI face up:

Battle of the Englishmen: Round1, Battle 16

Jack Hobbs
61 tests, 5410 runs @ 56.94 (15 centuries, 28 half-centuries), 1 wicket @ 165.00



vs

Herbert Sutcliffe
54 matches, 4555 runs @ 60.73 (16 centuries, 23 half-centuries)

 

JBH001

International Regular
Jeez Brumby, you did save the toughest and the best for last.

<========================= (self explanatory)

Hobbs for me - the original Master, and perhaps the second best ever.
 

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
Sutcliffe is a bit stiff here, closer than most people think I reckon, so I'll give him a vote to make it interesting ;)
 

Top