Piper
International Captain
Four sure.. I think this challenge I will win, unlike the lastalways great to see a sporting opponent.
Four sure.. I think this challenge I will win, unlike the lastalways great to see a sporting opponent.
Haha, btw nice avatar you have thereFour sure.. I think this challenge I will win, unlike the last
^ I don't have a clue what you are on about but i choose Sourav Ganguly for obvious reasons.
I was thinking more along the lines of if X favourite players of mine doesn't score X amount of runs then I'll have to have something embarrassing as my avatar.
You had better.. GrrrHaha, btw nice avatar you have there
/will leave now.
Aww, what? They're two of your faves... so why not have a challenge involving both?I was thinking more along the lines of if X favourite players of mine doesn't score X amount of runs then I'll have to have something embarrassing as my avatar.
Bell vs Collingwood doesn't really work because they're two of my favourite batsmen.
Because he'd have to hope one of them did poorly.Aww, what? They're two of your faves... so why not have a challenge involving both?
I could never hope that either Kallis or Watson did poorly, for example, though. So it just wouldn't work for me. Same probably applied to Geg.Exactly, which would mean it was a win-win... whatever happens, one of them's done better.
If he bets with one of his favourites, it's a double-lose if you lose.
Yes, that is a possibility, but he'd naturally be wanting to hope one did poorly while still rooting for at the same time.He doesn't, actually, have to hope that either does poorly, that's the even greater majesty of it. Bell could score 452 runs and Collingwood 390... and vice-versa and he'd still have a bet without either of them failing!
Yeah, I bet against Watson once. I won, but never again will I do that. Strangest mixed emotions while watching it.Well, your betting expertise > mine, TBH, I have no clue about the pyscolysis of these situations.
Four sure.. I think this challenge I will win, unlike the last
I'm not losing my avatar because of a load of dropped catches. It'd have to be based on first-chance runs if you wanted to do it.You don't rate Collingwood, Richard, so how about a little challenge between us? I.E. if he does/doesn't score a certain amount of runs, or summat...
If either one doesn't achieve it you can pick my avatar for a month after Mitchell's done with it, if I lose the challenge I'm having with him.That's basically a half-century every innings...
Bit of an iffy call IMO, especially for Bell on the presumption that he'd bat six.
The challenge here is:If either one doesn't achieve it you can pick my avatar for a month after Mitchell's done with it, if I lose the challenge I'm having with him.
Maybe even a sig change could be thought up...