Yeah - He definitely has impressive figures. In just 5 tests.Flower was really good against India VI, felt like a blessing the few times we managed to get him out.
As long as he's not keeping he's a fine pickI'm not a keen fan on picking people to tour India based on a few games. I mean seriously... Flower?
It's the same as not including someone based on a few games.
Zaheer? Is that Zaheer Khan the left armer who averages 36 in India with a SR of 70. No thanks.Very hard leaving out Gillespie but opted for Wasim for variety. They'll take on
Sehwag
Dravid
Laxman
Tendulkar
Kohli
Pant
Jadeja ew
Ashwin
Kumble
Zaheer
Bumrah
Just leave out Zaheer and play with one pacer and 3 spinners.Zaheer? Is that Zaheer Khan the left armer who averages 36 in India with a SR of 70. No thanks.
Consider Javagal Srinath instead. Average of 26.xx and a SR of 55. And brutal pace to go with it.
Picked him as a keeper and yeah probably a bad move but i couldn't think of many. Could have gone with DeVilliers who has a good record but again not a specialist keeper or you could just go with Gilchrist whose record i'm sure isn't very good but made two fantastic hundreds both resulting in wins and wins in India do not come by easily.As long as he's not keeping he's a fine pick
But Srinath is indisputably world class and provides that extra pace. Same with Shami. So why leave them out? In Kumble, Ashwin and Jadeja, the team would have a strong spin attack who are all very different in styles. 2 quicks in Srinath and Shami with a world class record in India and their extra pace make it a well rounded attack.Just leave out Zaheer and play with one pacer and 3 spinners.
Surely he would have made NZ and England'sSrinath was hardly "world class". Apart from Zimbabwe and Sri Lanka (where he would've been behind Streak and Vaas), how many teams would he have made in the 90s? He wouldn't have made NZ or England's 1st choice XI in the 90s, let alone Pakistan, South Africa, Australia, or the Windies.