#batdeepI stand by the XI I had in mind 15 years back. Nothing has changed.
Hobbs
Hutton
Bradman
Tendulkar
Richards
Sobers
Gilchrist
Imran
Hadlee
Marshall
Warne
Always been a big fan of this especially in tests. And every one in that lower order is still ATG in bowling alone.#batdeep
Not really. It's just that techniques were so different back then, it's hard for me to appreciate it. This isn't a greatest XI as much as players I would like to watch XI.harsh, have you gone for virtually all modern players because of uncertainty about how the old timers would stack up, Bradman apart?
Of the players I have seen,This is a very good side imho. Might have slightly different views on one or two but can honestly say there isn't a bloke in that XI who imo does not belong in the argument.
I think it's interesting that there's starting to develop a bit of a consensus surrounding the openers among a fair few people. There's no shortage of great openers from the modern era, but those two really endure.
If it was only player's I've seen live, my XI would be:
Gavaskar
Boycott
Ponting
Tendulkar
Richards
Border (c)
Gilchrist
Imran
Warne
Marshall
McGrath
Again, the likes of Lara, Greenidge, Kallis, Dravid, Ambrose, Crowe, Hadlee, Murali, Sanga, Lillee, Chappell all very unlucky. Picked Ponting basically on his peak and because he and Viv are the best players of raw pace I've seen. And how you've played pace has always been a big deal for me because of the physical threat, rather than looking nice as you dance down the deck like a ballerina to a rubbish finger spinner. I realize people will disagree, particularly regarding TOTAB, but my views on him are well known and not subject to compromise.
This is a very good team and can truly beat the hell out of leather off the team that comes from Mars. Will be my ATG XI as well.I stand by the XI I had in mind 15 years back. Nothing has changed.
Hobbs
Hutton
Bradman
Tendulkar
Richards
Sobers
Gilchrist
Imran
Hadlee
Marshall
Warne
Any idea where he fielded ? Was he a good fielder ? Don't want him to end up dropping catches when Warne is bowling.I find the prospect of Hobbs, a simple Christian man born in the 19th century, playing alongside an egoistical manwhore like Warne very very amusing.
I will always prefer a mixed bag. There are so many cases where a team has gone with 4 similar fast bowlers on a pacy pitch and the strategy failed outright.Sometimes I wonder if facing an attack of McGrath, Hadlee, Ambrose, and Garner is tougher than a mixed bag of styles like Imran/Wasim, Marshall, Warne, One-of-those-4
Yeah . . . probably a fair bit of a gulf in quality to the ones we're talking about though. Not sure you can really compare.I will always prefer a mixed bag. There are so many cases where a team has gone with 4 similar fast bowlers on a pacy pitch and the strategy failed outright.