bagapath
International Captain
True. He was awesome in the middle order. Should not be asked to open, considering his partner is just a first class giant. your team will have bradman at the wicket within the first hour.Yeah. Viv is overrated.
True. He was awesome in the middle order. Should not be asked to open, considering his partner is just a first class giant. your team will have bradman at the wicket within the first hour.Yeah. Viv is overrated.
As a matter of coincidence I have been watching a few of the youtube footage taken from documentaries like interviews about Imran and it really seems he was a brilliant natural leader. So matured, clear in his thoughts and vision, as good a student as you would get of the art of fast bowling and a great influence for youngsters in the team. The way the likes of Wasim talked about him you could see how much he contributed in shaping their career.Not only did he get tough personalities to work well he lifted his game to another level when he was captain.
I agree with you on this. Michael Holding just summed up Imran's captaincy perfectly IMO. He said "When Imran Khan walked out onto the field, the ten men with him, believed in him, believed in the team that he was leading, and believed that Pakistan could achieve anything." That's the kind of guy i would want to be leading my team. Obviously you don't want a complete dumbass as a tactician (which he wasn't either) but he was always attacking and always looking to win.As a matter of coincidence I have been watching a few of the youtube footage taken from documentaries like interviews about Imran and it really seems he was a brilliant natural leader. So matured, clear in his thoughts and vision, as good a student as you would get of the art of fast bowling and a great influence for youngsters in the team. The way the likes of Wasim talked about him you could see how much he contributed in shaping their career.
Personally I prefer personalities such as this if you ask me who should "lead" a group of players, let alone stars. Maybe someone like Taylor was tactically more astute and more capable of changing the game with a bit of brilliant strategy, but at the end of the day you need someone everyone looks up to, someone who leads by example, someone who's there for you to support you whenever you are going through a bad patch and need help, etc.
I seem to have read/heard similar things about Frank Worrell, that he was a great leader and personality who was adored by everyone. I might be wrong but I haven't seen his name taken as much as some others when discussing great captains. I think it was Richie Benaud who was in awe of him as a leader and a person.
Bradman would walk in to bat after the openers destroyed the bowling attack and get out for a duck.True. He was awesome in the middle order. Should not be asked to open, considering his partner is just a first class giant. your team will have bradman at the wicket within the first hour.
vs.England XI
Highest batting average in each batting position (1 to 7) with greater than 2000 runs.
Lowest bowling Average for each bowling position (opening bowlers, first change, and second change) with greater than 100 wickets.
01. Len Hutton
02. Herbert Sutcliffe
03. Ken Barrington
04. Peter May
05. Graham Thorpe
06. Tony Greig
07. Alan Knott
08. Ian Botham
09. Fred Trueman
10. Derek Underwood
11. Sydney Barnes
I'd hesitate to say he was the best, but he was utterly defiant, and until he got into bed with Packer was immensely popularQuick question. Was Tony Greig England's best batsman of the 70s? Because all I hear about England vs Lillee-Thommo and Windies-Pace-attack is that he was the only one who handled them well during that time.
For someone who was able to give two fingers to Lillee and Thompson, David Steel was treated very harshly. I realise he ran into some bad form and his FC career wasn't so notable, but standing up to the Australians so defiantly should have earned him some loyaltyHighest Average against Lillee and Thomson. Three Tests or more.
David Steel (3) = 61
John Edrich (7) = 48
Alan Knott (9) = 39
Tony Grieg (9) = 36
And the rest......
Which is why I don't mind picking Alan Knott in my ATG team. Very good batsman against true fast bowling.
Also, John Edrich is unjustly overlooked when we go searching for great opening batsman IMO.
I agree with you, but he wasn't expected to be suited to India in 76/77, and was 36 by the time the '77 Aussies arrived - he played the quicks with great courage and some panache, but he did ride his luck, and had the selectors stuck by him I think his career would have quickly fizzled out, which would have spoiled what remains a great storyFor someone who was able to give two fingers to Lillee and Thompson, David Steel was treated very harshly. I realise he ran into some bad form and his FC career wasn't so notable, but standing up to the Australians so defiantly should have earned him some loyalty
I am going to be magnanimous here, and assume that this was a failed attempt at humour.Public Service Announcement: Be wary of people who don't like the idea of Barry and Viv opening the batting. They may be paedophiles, or worse, anglophiles.
Good work. Just curious though….George Lohmann?Best Averages XI
Lohmann didn't make the 100 wicket cutoff for either opening bowler or first change duties. I did slacken the cutoffs for South Africa, India, and Pakistan a little so I could actually get a player to fit the criteria. But there was no problem getting batsman or bowlers with England.Good work. Just curious though….George Lohmann?
Edit…guessing you mean 100 wickets in each individual bowling position?
While the teams are probably not the strongest they are 'solid' as you say, and do highlight the fact that we forget batsman like Graham Thorpe who was obviously a cracking middle-order batsman.Those teams are all very solid aren't they? Hard to argue.