Not in order necessarily. More like the names that immediately popped out as I went down the list.
I wouldn’t call any batsman who averages 50+ a bad batsman either, but we did that/are doing that.There is literally zero bad bowlers in that list, though I may rate Philander lower than others in the list.
So, Philander I guess.
Shiv is ass, so is Yousuf.I wouldn’t call any batsman who averages 50+ a bad batsman either, but we did that/are doing that.
Grow up. If you’re calling them bad batsmen then you should stop following cricket since you’re only going to be seeing a few non-bad batsmen in the world at once.Shiv is ass, so is Yousuf.
He's joking smhGrow up. If you’re calling them bad batsmen then you should stop following cricket since you’re only going to be seeing a few non-bad batsmen in the world at once.
They’re not as great as some others who averaged over 50. That doesn’t make them bad.
Lol didn't know that'd be offensive.Grow up. If you’re calling them bad batsmen then you should stop following cricket since you’re only going to be seeing a few non-bad batsmen in the world at once.
They’re not as great as some others who averaged over 50. That doesn’t make them bad.
They aren’t bad batsmen at all. Just not as as great as some of the best batsmen of all time.Shiv is ass, so is Yousuf.
Bit harsh on Hazlewood imo.Philander followed by Hazelwood.
Both in true sense should be averaging 26-27.
what is his record in Asia?Bit harsh on Hazlewood imo.
Hasn’t played in Pakistanwhat is his record in Asia?
Its not the best. tbf, he hasn’t had a proper shot in Asia in 8 years. (no I’m not counting the one test against Pakistan where only 4 wickets fell over the 2 Pakistani innings against him). He also had that excellent game in Bengalaru taking a 6’fer when other pacers could only manage 8 wickets the entire match. Unfortunately it looks like he’s going to miss the SL tour as well.what is his record in Asia?
ThisHe hasn’t had a proper shot in Asia in 8 years.