Tendulkar Vs Warne

[Jumno]

Who is the better cricketer?

 

[kyear2]

Tendulkar, intrigued to see how many switch votes from The Richards / Warne thread.

The explanations should be even better.

 

[sayon basak]

Who is the better cricketer?

Tendulkar for his bowling

 

[subshakerz]

Tendulkar easily better.

 

[Migara]

Tendulkar, it's not even a contest.

Tendulkar and Warne are on part with tests with bat vs ball. In ODIs, It's not even a contest. Tendulkar way ahead in primary discipline.
Fielding wise they are par.
Secondary discipline, Tendulkar is ahead.

 

[subshakerz]

Warne is good enough to tie Tendulkar's shoelaces.

 

[kyear2]

This is not a serious place

 

[subshakerz]

This is not a serious place

Why so serious?

 

[honestbharani]

Does not have the same impact without the Heath Ledger Joker pic.

 

[subshakerz]

Does not have the same impact without the Heath Ledger Joker pic.

You're right. I couldn't find the gif.

 

[Arachnodouche]

The more interesting consideration is how much does an ATG's standing suffer if he was as overwhelmingly dominated by another ATG in a head-to-head as is the case here. Is there another instance of such a lop-sided dynamic between two undisputed greats?

 

[subshakerz]

The more interesting consideration is how much does an ATG's standing suffer if he was as overwhelmingly dominated by another ATG in a head-to-head as is the case here. Is there another instance of such a lop-sided dynamic between two undisputed greats?

Steve Waugh owned Donald.

Lara owned Murali.

 

[OverratedSanity]

Tendulkar, intrigued to see how many switch votes from The Richards / Warne thread.

The explanations should be even better.

Tendulkar > Warne > Richards is a perfectly reasonable opinion tbh and doesn't need long explanations to justify.

 

[subshakerz]

Biggest issue with rating Warne is McGrath. Kind of hard to rate a guy so highly who is playing second fiddle most of his career to someone clearly superior.

 

[Migara]

Tendulkar > Warne > Richards is a perfectly reasonable opinion tbh and doesn't need long explanations to justify.

Nah.

Tendulkar, Richards and Warne are comparable in their primary discipline in tests.
Tendulkar and Richards are a tier above Warne in the primary skill in ODIs.
Tendulkar's and Richard's secondary discipline is better than Warne's at any form of cricket.
Difference between Tendulkar and Richards in test is lesser than that of Tendulkar and Richards in ODIs.
Tendulkar is the better bowler and way more versatile. Richards is a better captain and slightly better fielder.

Tendulkar = Richards > Warne

 

[subshakerz]

If it wasn't for the English press, Warne would probably average a few points higher. They instilled a fear of him that lead to a mountain of more English and SA wickets.

 

[Migara]

If it wasn't for the English press, Warne would probably average a few points higher. They instilled a fear of him that lead to a mountain of more English and SA wickets.

The reason why he was not successful as in ODIs. The dominant teams were out of SE & N.

 

[subshakerz]

Tendulkar > Warne > Richards is a perfectly reasonable opinion tbh and doesn't need long explanations to justify.

As per the rules of @kyear2, Warne is not an ATG as he didn't achieve sub-25. sorry, them's the facts.

 

[capt_Luffy]

Biggest issue with rating Warne is McGrath. Kind of hard to rate a guy so highly who is playing second fiddle most of his career to someone clearly superior.

Funny things is how they were perceived during their playing days.....

 

[subshakerz]

Funny things is how they were perceived during their playing days.....

All SC fans feared McGrath more.