Tendulkar for his bowlingWho is the better cricketer?
Why so serious?This is not a serious place
You're right. I couldn't find the gif.Does not have the same impact without the Heath Ledger Joker pic.
Steve Waugh owned Donald.The more interesting consideration is how much does an ATG's standing suffer if he was as overwhelmingly dominated by another ATG in a head-to-head as is the case here. Is there another instance of such a lop-sided dynamic between two undisputed greats?
Tendulkar > Warne > Richards is a perfectly reasonable opinion tbh and doesn't need long explanations to justify.Tendulkar, intrigued to see how many switch votes from The Richards / Warne thread.
The explanations should be even better.
Nah.Tendulkar > Warne > Richards is a perfectly reasonable opinion tbh and doesn't need long explanations to justify.
The reason why he was not successful as in ODIs. The dominant teams were out of SE & N.If it wasn't for the English press, Warne would probably average a few points higher. They instilled a fear of him that lead to a mountain of more English and SA wickets.
As per the rules of @kyear2, Warne is not an ATG as he didn't achieve sub-25. sorry, them's the facts.Tendulkar > Warne > Richards is a perfectly reasonable opinion tbh and doesn't need long explanations to justify.
Funny things is how they were perceived during their playing days.....Biggest issue with rating Warne is McGrath. Kind of hard to rate a guy so highly who is playing second fiddle most of his career to someone clearly superior.
All SC fans feared McGrath more.Funny things is how they were perceived during their playing days.....