I mean in most people’s minds? (at least in mine) they’re barely differential as bowlers. So yeah if I have 2 practically equal bowlers I’ll go with the one that can also bat. That’s also my rationale for Hammond and Sutcliffe in my XI.
I think they are close to equally effective but Warne has more aggro vibes on the field that will do better for the team.
The same rationale mate not the exact same situation obviously, do you need it more spelled out?
Nah I got you.
Murali easily will defend those 7 runs with the ball. He takes more wickets per innings and can bowl way more,
Why would he be needing to bowl way more with an ATG support cast?
when was warne a captain?
IPL.
you can't say he would have been a great test captain based on ipl. he was okaish even in ipl.
I think he would have been a bottomline good captain for an average side.
he captained in the IPL and won, and is widely regarded as someone who would've been a great captain had he gotten the opportunity, here he was dubbed the Greatest captain Australia never had.
Would have been a terrible one given his absolute indiscipline. Think of him captaining Dhanushka Gunatillake, Kusal Mendis and Niroshan Dikwella. That would be tabloids dreams.
Ah, fair. tbh though, didn’t seem like Warne was getting tired in his matches and could have shouldered a bigger load if necessary, but yeah advantage Murali there
Possible. But on the flip side it would be a fun team and he never compromised on winning.
He also lost another 2 or 3 years after that. Its not like he won 1 in 1.