• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Symonds: Gawn?

Redbacks

International Captain
Yeah, it's very disappointing. :(

I was one of his biggest fans, too.

That's what 'alcoholism' can do to you.

He was never the same after that Sydney Test. More and more, that Test is looking like a phyrric Australian victory - the fallout from it rendered the Australian victory nearly worthless, forshadowing as it did a year-long decline. Symonds is merely one of the worst affected by it.
Link
After the 1932–33 Bodyline cricket tour of Australia, England labelled Australians "sore losers" while Australians labelled England cheats. Trade between the two countries was adversely affected and till this day the series is used to reflect the character of each respective country.

In 2008, another cricket series was used to reflect the character of Australia and another nation. India, the world's most financially powerful cricketing nation duelled with Australia, the undisputed world champions of the game. Needing to survive one over against a part-time bowler in order to save a test match, the Indians lost three wickets in five balls. Not surprisingly, the Indians were emotional regarding their mental disintegration, and blamed everyone from neutral umpires to Australian arrogance for their loss. The Indian cricket board threatened to cancel the tour, Indian fans burnt pictures of Australian players, and Australia's history as a Convict colony was again used to cast dispersions upon the Australian character.

Professional Australian commentators were also disappointed with the result. Appreciating the boring nature of one Australian victory after another, they had been hoping that India would give a contest. Consequently, the Australian team's jubilance at India's collapse conflicted with their own feelings of disappointment. Some commentators, such as Peter Roebuck, called for the Australian captain to be sacked. Other commentators, such as ex-player Geoff Lawson, criticised Australia's win-at-all-costs mentality. Presumably, the likes of Lawson and Roebuck wanted the Australian cricketers to apply the spirit of backyard cricket. Specifically, lesser players can't be given out first ball, and no fast bowling to the kids or the ladies.

Problems escalated when an Indian player, Harbhajan Singh referred to Australian player Andrew Symmonds, as a monkey. The Indian player had previously referred to Symmonds as a monkey in India when Symmonds had been subjected to monkey chants by the Indian crowd. Symmonds put in a complaint and Singh was found guilty of racial abuse by a neutral match referee. The Indian Board threatened to withdraw from the tour unless the decision was overturned in the subsequent appeal. The decision was, much to the disgust of the Australian players who felt the Australian Cricket Board put profit before principle.
sold out!!
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
Wow, whoever wrote that tripe has his head further up his own ass than Sreesanth. People who believe that simply don't ever want to get it.
 

Son Of Coco

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
"The other thing is he might just be sick [of cricket]," Healy told radio station 2KY. "He's just cooked and tired of cricket and sort of wants to be dropped.

"I'm not sure whether Symo wants to play cricket or be bound by contracts or be bound by the Cricket Australia structure. I sense that he might be seeking the freedom that IPL and maybe a county stint might offer him."


Corresponds to howardj's theory as well. Bit of a douchebag thing to do if that was his intention.
Yeah, could have just said he didn't want to play. Although that might effect future contracts offered in the IPl and county cricket if it came across as him being over cricket altogether I suppose.
 

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
So, based on that article...

if Symonds was never given a repreive by Bucknor and scored that ton, and then pissed off Harbhajan resulting in the incient. India would have won and everything would be swell with Symo? :dry:


:p
 

Trumpers_Ghost

U19 Cricketer
What was the source of that article? Who wrote it? Was it copied in it's entirity? These things would be helpful when transposing the opinions of someone not on the forum.

Article did cherrypick issues from the game .... but really to compare it to the legacy of bodyline is a bit rich.
 

Craig

World Traveller
Apparently Symonds is 'too Australian' according to Dean Jones. What the hell is 'too Australian'? This 'too Australian' or 'not Australian' is just a load of crap.
 

Redbacks

International Captain
So, based on that article...

if Symonds was never given a repreive by Bucknor and scored that ton, and then pissed off Harbhajan resulting in the incient. India would have won and everything would be swell with Symo? :dry:


:p
was written ages ago and has nothing to do with the current situation, mearly pointing out the overall situation around how the players were pissed off that CA didn't back them up. This related to the post I quoted refering to Symonds coming into trouble after the incident with a bit of background as to how CA were conflicted in making a decision. Simple.
 

duffer

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Apparently Symonds is 'too Australian' according to Dean Jones. What the hell is 'too Australian'? This 'too Australian' or 'not Australian' is just a load of crap.
It's Deano, just ignore him.
 

Redbacks

International Captain
Article did cherrypick issues from the game .... but really to compare it to the legacy of bodyline is a bit rich.
What legacy? It compared how the issue may reflect on the underlying cultures of the two nations, similar to how bodyline became a defining moment in Australian-England relations.
 

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
was written ages ago and has nothing to do with the current situation, mearly pointing out the overall situation around how the players were pissed off that CA didn't back them up. This related to the post I quoted refering to Symonds coming into trouble after the incident with a bit of background as to how CA were conflicted in making a decision. Simple.
I was just taking the piss man.

Couldn't care less about Symonds. If people/players actually think CA 'stabbed him in the back', then so be it. Doesn't justify a lack of respect for your teammates though.

He didn't just let down Sutherland, he let down his whole team, many of whom have backed up for many years.
 

Top