archie mac
International Coach
Not wanting to start a hornest nest, but I was watching quite a lot of the Sri Lanka V NZ match, and I really think they should retest Murali when he is bowling his Doosra (spelling)
adharcric said:Can we get some reasoning Archie?![]()
Er, yah. News to me, Murali is a finger spinner?
Quote Murali's stats at home and away? Having played more than half his games there, don't even try to brush it off. Then look at Murali in Australia, where, apart from Sydney, there really is no spinner's pitches and see how he does there? Then see how Warne does at home. And if it's purely about the Australian side, go quote Kumble's stats in Australia or Vettori's.
The obvious will remain: Murali does MUCH better at home and considering that's where he plays most his cricket it does inflate the ol' record - as do other things regarding Murali.
Hmm, I have a few issues myself with the Doosra. though perhaps not as many as I did a while ago. Murali can bowl the Doosra with minimal flex as he showed when bowling with the arm brace on, only he bowls it a lot slower - partly explained by the weight of the brace, and partly by not bowling naturally at all.archie mac said:I was trying to be subtle, but I thought his arm was bending a lot more for that delivery then his standard ball (which I know he has a permanent bend) but for the doosra it seemed much more pronounced.
I know he has had trouble in the past with his doosra, so maybe he needs to be re-tested to make sure he has not gotten back into bad habits![]()
Overall his away record is inferior to Warne. And their record in Australia really illustrates something about the two.JBH001 said:Errr, actually Murali's record overseas bar Australia is better than or equal to Warne's in nearly every test playing nation.
Missed the point. The point is that spinners as a whole do not do that well in Sri Lanka, whether they are finger-spinners or leg-spinners. Thus, there's no sound reasoning behind saying that he plays on 'doctored' pitches.KaZoH0lic said:Er, yah. News to me, Murali is a finger spinner?
Murali has only played three games in Australia and two of those were early in his career when he was a much worse bowler than he is now. He did a decent job and was unlucky in the recent 'SuperTest' against Australia.KaZoH0lic said:Quote Murali's stats at home and away?Having played more than half his games there, don't even try to brush it off. Then look at Murali in Australia, where, apart from Sydney, there really is no spinner's pitches and see how he does there? Then see how Warne does at home. And if it's purely about the Australian side, go quote Kumble's stats in Australia or Vettori's.
How does it inflate the record? They're not 'doctored' pitches, no matter how many times you say it it still won't be true. The other things regarding Murali that you claim inflate his record only do so in terms of number of wickets. He still has a better record than Warne if you remove his games against Zimbabwe and Bangladesh. Then again, you tried to argue elsewhere that Warne is better purely because he has more wickets. I suppose you'll be declaring Kumble a better bowler than Ambrose then.KaZoH0lic said:The obvious will remain: Murali does MUCH better at home and considering that's where he plays most his cricket it does inflate the ol' record - as do other things regarding Murali.
Except Murali and Warne, right? And as a comparison between these two how do they shape up? Hmm, yeah, I'm sure you get the point.Dasa said:Missed the point. The point is that spinners as a whole do not do that well in Sri Lanka, whether they are finger-spinners or leg-spinners. Thus, there's no sound reasoning behind saying that he plays on 'doctored' pitches.
Oh okay, so should we also take out tests where Warne wasn't a good bowler?Dasa said:Murali has only played three games in Australia and two of those were early in his career when he was a much worse bowler than he is now. He did a decent job and was unlucky in the recent 'SuperTest' against Australia.
How doesn't it? Bowling on your home ground, against the weaker sides, pretty much by yourself, and not expecting to take a bag-full of wickets and not concede as many on THAT pitch? Dude, look at his average for home and away. If you don't think it inflates his record, I have nothing to say to you.Dasa said:How does it inflate the record? They're not 'doctored' pitches, no matter how many times you say it it still won't be true. The other things regarding Murali that you claim inflate his record only do so in terms of number of wickets. He still has a better record than Warne if you remove his games against Zimbabwe and Bangladesh. Then again, you tried to argue elsewhere that Warne is better purely because he has more wickets. I suppose you'll be declaring Kumble a better bowler than Ambrose then.
Oh really?KaZoH0lic said:Overall his away record is inferior to Warne. And their record in Australia really illustrates something about the two.
Surprised by their poor form in India, always suppose to help the spinners, I know Warne had a bad shoulder during one series, what is MMs excuse?JBH001 said:MM vs India 8 tests 31 wkts 39.58 rpw 81.8 SR
SW vs India 9 tests 34 wkts 43.11 rpw 81.0 SR
Indians in India are probably the best players of spin on the planet, and always have been.archie mac said:Surprised by their poor form in India, always suppose to help the spinners, I know Warne had a bad shoulder during one series, what is MMs excuse?
Yeah, really.JBH001 said:Oh really?
Mat O R W BBI BBM Ave Econ SR 5 10
Murali 49 2586.2 6671 268 9/65 16/220 24.89 2.57 57.9 20 6
Warne 76 3548 9575 389 7/94 12/246 24.61 2.69 54.7 22 6
To just to add to that, the foreigner who plays spin well in India was Andy Flower. That dude just dominated our spinners, almost gave me a heart attack every time he batted. Foreigners aren't supposed to do that to our spinners at home.archie mac said:Surprised by their poor form in India, always suppose to help the spinners, I know Warne had a bad shoulder during one series, what is MMs excuse?
Yeah i heard Warne popped his shoulder in one series and than was out of form soon as he landed in india.archie mac said:Surprised by their poor form in India, always suppose to help the spinners, I know Warne had a bad shoulder during one series, what is MMs excuse?
His series averages in India are:R_D said:Yeah i heard Warne popped his shoulder in one series and than was out of form soon as he landed in india.![]()
Murali only toured india once after 98 or 99. He wasn't that good of a bowler in the 90's. He had avg of 102 in a 2 test match series in 93 i think. He toured india last year and had a pretty good series. He ran through the indian batting lineup somthing i'm yet to see the Greatest Spinner ever born do yet.
Maybe should read about it and you will not have to roll your eyesR_D said:Yeah i heard Warne popped his shoulder in one series and than was out of form soon as he landed in india.![]()
I don't remember saying he was the greatest spinner ever, I don't know what form SRT was in that last series V SL, but I think his batting made Warne look 2nd rate when ever they clashed in IndiaR_D said:Murali only toured india once after 98 or 99. He wasn't that good of a bowler in the 90's. He had avg of 102 in a 2 test match series in 93 i think. He toured india last year and had a pretty good series. He ran through the indian batting lineup somthing i'm yet to see the Greatest Spinner ever born do yet.