marc71178
Eyes not spreadsheets
One of the best certainly, but if he's the best, how come PwC has him behind Pollock in both forms of the game?age_master said:McGrath is the best pace bowler in the world, get over it
One of the best certainly, but if he's the best, how come PwC has him behind Pollock in both forms of the game?age_master said:McGrath is the best pace bowler in the world, get over it
Every ground has seen big totals. What's your point?Craig said:Yes, but Babados has seen some really big totals on it.
PWC is not the be all and end all.marc71178 said:One of the best certainly, but if he's the best, how come PwC has him behind Pollock in both forms of the game?
Neither is an opinion. IMO Pollock and McGrath are probably on par.Eclipse said:I mean you say it like PWC is 100% accurate.
How dumb do you think I am ??Mr Mxyzptlk said:Neither is an opinion. IMO Pollock and McGrath are probably on par.
Why are you getting upset??? What did I say that could be construed as an insult?? Calm down.Eclipse said:How dumb do you think I am ??
I think it can be safly assumed that I dont think an opinion is 100% accurate or even close to accurate in many cases.
I am not upset I just wonderd why you came up with that my post was ment to query why marc used PwC as if it was the diffinitive judge of a bowler.Mr Mxyzptlk said:Why are you getting upset??? What did I say that could be construed as an insult?? Calm down.
If your team's short of batting I wouldn't bet against it. Anyway Pollock takes wickets very cheaply and can bat, who wouldn't want him over McGrath? Maybe slightly less penetrating as a bowler but his batting makes up for it. A true all-rounder.royGilchrist said:Is there any team or any cpatain in the world, who at the moment will pick Pollock over McGrath?
Why do people have the mentality that Pollock has done nothing in recent times??royGilchrist said:Pollock used to be awesome, but now he has just become a mediocre medium pacer.
The problem is a few people here have a tough time with analyzing a hypothetical situation.If your team's short of batting I wouldn't bet against it.
Everyone is entitled to a perspective and opinion and my honest view may be different from your's. The above statement basically seeks to take away our right to an individual perspective because it's saying that if we don't consider McGrath the best, then we are, quite frankly, wrong. In a matter such as this, one cannot be wrong or right per se. It's all opinionated and only God knows for certain what the right answer is in such a matter.royGilchrist said:I am surprised that we are even discussing who the best fast bowler in the world is today, it one thing where there should be complete agreement between everyone. Its obvious.
I noticed that as well.Rik said:Hmmm, I log on to Cricinfo and what do I find? Bangladesh have just beaten the Australian Academy. It's not a good idea to read into one result, but the players in that team are going to have to take the place of the current Australian team when they retire, and although the dec was competitive, Bangladesh got it after an early collapse. Interisting
Yeah a I agree with that they are easy to counteract.marc71178 said:Well, at present Pollock is bowling supremely.
And Eclipse, I never expressed an opinion that PwC are the be all and end all, just pointed out that statements like "McGrath is the best pace bowler in the world, get over it" tend to be easy to counteract.