• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Shane Warne vs Imran Khan

Shane Warne vs Imran Khan


  • Total voters
    28

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Imran in the 80s vs WI: 51 wickets in 10 tests@16.

Imran in the WSC: 25 wickets@20.

Imran once had 7/8 series in a row averaging sub 20.

Unfortunately Imran the bowler will continue to be underrated because many want to come up with excuses to deny how good he actually was as a bowler in his prime and also wants to apply the same standards of a bowler who played 21 years of cricket as one who played 14 years.
 
Last edited:

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
Holding had a better away record by some margin.

Holding away - 163 wickets at avg of 23-24 - SR 51
IK away - 184 wickets at avg of 26-27 - SR 60

It was reverse at home. IK had a better home record by some margin.


Only question is how much weight you give to home vs away for that period when we are having to debate about who benefitted more due to biased home umpiring or who got to tamper the ball openly more than others.

I will take Donald over IK even though I will put them in the same bracket.
Yeah, Donald, Lillee and Imran are ridiculously close. Donald gets underrated the most and may just have been better than the other two.

It's really close. I give Imran the edge die to peer rating, but by that argument it should be easily Lillee.

But yeah, Donald is underappreciated,.most SA players are.
 

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
Top 8 bowlers for me,

Marshall
McGrath/Hadlee
Steyn/Ambrose
Warne/Murali
Donald

Having listed it, I learn many new things while interacting with others. Exact order can change with time specially for players I did not watch live.
Not mine, as I have McGrath as having a small but definite advantage over Hadlee, and yeah, I would still add Imran and Lillee next to Donald.
Wasim and Donald right behind.
 

Johan

Cricketer Of The Year
I disagree

Either Barnes is at the absolute top or he doesn’t make the list at all.
Why?

McGrath has the greater Ashes record despite more batting friendly wickets and I can see him replicate Barnes's performance on the South African matting wickets.
 

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
Why?

McGrath has the greater Ashes record despite more batting friendly wickets and I can see him replicate Barnes's performance on the South African matting wickets.
So what's the justification for having him above Hadlee?
 

Johan

Cricketer Of The Year
So what's the justification for having him above Hadlee?
Probably not much between them in quality, would take Barnes there probably as I think more Batsmen found success against Hadlee than they did against Burnes, but Barnes, like Bedser and Fazal, can bowl the amount of overs equivalent to a spinner and thus have a higher impact on the game, He bowls more overs than Shane Warne on average. There's a reason for a 6 WPM in Australia and 7 in general.
 
Last edited:

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
Marshall. Hadlee. McGrath.
Steyn.
Ambrose. Donald. Holding. Lillee. Imran. Akram.
Marshall. Hadlee. McGrath.

Steyn. Ambrose. Warne. Muralitharan.

Donald. Holding. O'Reilly. Lillee. Imran. Akram.

Trueman. Garner. Lindwall. Bumrah. Garner. Davidson. Pollock.

Top 20 for me.
 

subshakerz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Marshall. Hadlee. McGrath.

Steyn. Ambrose. Warne. Muralitharan.

Donald. Holding. O'Reilly. Lillee. Imran. Akram.

Trueman. Garner. Lindwall. Bumrah. Garner. Davidson. Pollock.

Top 20 for me.
Yeah, Donald, Lillee and Imran are ridiculously close. Donald gets underrated the most and may just have been better than the other two.

It's really close. I give Imran the edge die to peer rating
Lol so close between Donald and Imran he can change his mind in the same page and fit in two more bowlers between them.
 

Randomfan

U19 Cricketer
Not mine, as I have McGrath as having a small but definite advantage over Hadlee, and yeah, I would still add Imran and Lillee next to Donald.
Wasim and Donald right behind.
So top 11 becomes,

Marshall
McGrath
Hadlee
Steyn/Ambrose
Warne/Murali
Donald/Lillee/IK
Wasim

I think you meant Holding? You listed Donald twice.

It's close to what I think. Sometimes, a minor differences can flip the order but honestly I have not thought about exact ranking for too long. I did not even think about comparing spinners and pacers earlier.

The longer I hear for and against arguments, the less fluid conclusion becomes in my head. If I have watched players then it becomes much easier.

What's your rationale for rating McGrath definnately ahead? Is it flat pitch in 00?
 

kyear2

Hall of Fame Member
Probably not much between them in quality, would take Barnes there probably as I think more Batsmen found success against Hadlee than they did against Burnes, but Barnes, like Bedser and Fazal, can bowl the amount of overs equivalent to a spinner and thus have a higher impact on the game, He bowls more overs than Shane Warne on average. There's a reason for a 6 WPM in Australia and 7 in general.
I can't rate a bowler I've never seen. Especially not one like him where everything about him has a shroud of uncertainty over it.
 

Top